AFL Team Draft - Results, Banter and Discussion

Started by Scrads, August 20, 2012, 02:01:34 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Holz

im extremely suprised at that top 4, I think if i played one of them i could have beat them by 10+ goals easy in a real game.

Its ok everyone has their opinions.

Jukes

Quote from: Holzman on September 02, 2012, 04:36:35 PM
im extremely suprised at that top 4, I think if i played one of them i could have beat them by 10+ goals easy in a real game.

Its ok everyone has their opinions.

/\ This

Reckon Holz and my teams would have easily beaten a few of that top 4.

monstrum


JBs-Hawks

Quote from: Jukes on September 02, 2012, 05:23:38 PM
Quote from: Holzman on September 02, 2012, 04:36:35 PM
im extremely suprised at that top 4, I think if i played one of them i could have beat them by 10+ goals easy in a real game.

Its ok everyone has their opinions.

/\ This

Reckon Holz and my teams would have easily beaten a few of that top 4.

Holz may have been a bit stiff however I reckon he rates his kanga defenders a little higher than most people ;)

Your number one pick was a fantasy whore but around shower player you never had a chance ;)

Noz

You guys might have beaten some but not my team.

KoopKicka

Would be interesting to see what my backline socred, reckon I was top 4 for that :)

Scrads

Here come the ratings for the bottom 8 teams guys :)

Mr.Craig

Quote from: Holzman on September 02, 2012, 04:36:35 PM
im extremely suprised at that top 4, I think if i played one of them i could have beat them by 10+ goals easy in a real game.

Its ok everyone has their opinions.

I have a feeling you were very close to top 4 Holz. I'm just as keen to see the scores as you guys!

Scrads

OK here are the results guys. Please note that the top 4 teams will be kept separate from their results until after the h2h matches. These scores a cumulative of all scores gained so the maximum is out of 250 (5 judges x 5 categories x out of 10)

Top 4:
Team A - 207
Team B - 206.5
Team C - 204.5
Team D- 202.5

Bottom 8:
Cleveland Cavaliers (Holz) - 201.5
Boston Celtics (monstrum) - 197.5
LA Lakers (BB) - 195
New York Knicks (Spinking) - 194
New Orleans Hornets (whatlez) - 192
OKC Thunder (Jukes) - 190
Harlem Globetrotters (Meow) - 189.5
Seattle Sonics (Koop) - 188.5

Spinking

Woohoo. Not bad! Better than I was thinking.

Judges must be Kosi fans  ;)

JBs-Hawks


Scrads

Just realised how lucky I was there wasn't a tie, as I did not consider what I would do in that case :o

The 'Prelim Finals' are as follows. I will list my game first as I am the first team alphabetically. Also there is no HGA, so I will list each match with their teams in alphabetical order. (This is so no one knows which is 1v4 and which is 2v3 and which team was ranked higher initially).

Atlanta Hawks (Scrads) v San Antonio Spurs (JB)

Chicago Bulls (Zombie) v Dallas Mavericks (Noz).

If nobody remembers, these mathces will be decided by the 5 judges simply voting 'Team X and Team Y'. As there are 5 judges there will not be a tie.

I will pm the judges and will let you know as soon as the results come in :)


KoopKicka


Holz

Quote from: JBs-Hawks on September 02, 2012, 05:30:50 PM
Quote from: Jukes on September 02, 2012, 05:23:38 PM
Quote from: Holzman on September 02, 2012, 04:36:35 PM
im extremely suprised at that top 4, I think if i played one of them i could have beat them by 10+ goals easy in a real game.

Its ok everyone has their opinions.

/\ This

Reckon Holz and my teams would have easily beaten a few of that top 4.

Holz may have been a bit stiff however I reckon he rates his kanga defenders a little higher than most people ;)

Your number one pick was a fantasy whore but around shower player you never had a chance ;)

yeah it must be the defence. I would say waters, reilly and johnson would all be chances for all australain half backs. So it must be the key postions players they dont like. Its a shame because frawley and grima are really good defenders.

Scrads

Important:
Judges please keep bits of info on how you rated like that to a minimum, at the end when all the results are revealed the players might be able to work out which judge is which by process of elimination and some judges would prefer to keep anonymity.