Mitchell late withdrawl ??

[FonFatty]

Bad news for Mitchell owners...Nick Maxwell has him on the bench :-\

Maxwell must have got this information from brad Sewell, they are in business together outside of football, car sales business I think.

[roo boys!]

Bad news for Mitchell owners...Nick Maxwell has him on the bench :-\

Maxwell must have got this information from brad Sewell, they are in business together outside of football, car sales business I think.

Maybe...but like nostra said, it's not the first time he's done this so would have connections everywhere.

[Ziplock]

yeah he did this last year with someone as well.

[Blues Blues Blues]

Just confirmed on Triple M, Savage will replace him

[roo boys!]

Chose a bad week, I woulda won at least 2 extra league games last week if he didn't play, but this week none of my opponents have him ::)

[Hazza09]

Yep! Confirmed out!
Like you Roo boys not one opp has him this week

[c4v3m4n]

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/144965/default.aspx

[devize]

Yes tigertops, NOW it is more than just speculation. Bl to Mitchell owners.

[BratPack]

It would have to happen the week I put the C on him cause he's playing GCS wouldn't it?

Helloooo Josh Kennedy

[Footyrulz]

far out! now i have a donut! luckily not playing this week.

[tigertops]

Devize.   I was telling u all along it was not just speculation it was from close to hawks nest. 

[devize]

Devize.   I was telling u all along it was not just speculation it was from close to hawks nest.

Dude, I don't know why I even bother. You clearly have no understanding of what speculation is. When you have no actual information, no sources, no evidence apart from a few whispers at the 'hawks nest' IT IS STILL SPECULATION. You were SPECULATING that Mitchell would be out based on rumours. That's it.

It was never about being wrong or right, I never said he was going to play or not. I was just saying that everything you said was pure speculation. Sure, it turned out to be true but that doesn't change anything. If you had created the thread today, with actual sources, then it wouldn't be just speculation.

[Marstar]

Devize.   I was telling u all along it was not just speculation it was from close to hawks nest.

Dude, I don't know why I even bother. You clearly have no understanding of what speculation is. When you have no actual information, no sources, no evidence apart from a few whispers at the 'hawks nest' IT IS STILL SPECULATION. You were SPECULATING that Mitchell would be out based on rumours. That's it.

It was never about being wrong or right, I never said he was going to play or not. I was just saying that everything you said was pure speculation. Sure, it turned out to be true but that doesn't change anything. If you had created the thread today, with actual sources, then it wouldn't be just speculation.

Speculation is a thought based off zero information.

For you it's speculation, because you're hearing it from an unreliable source, that being tigertops ( a random poster on a footy site). For you that is zero information.

For Tigertops it's not speculation 'cause he's hearing it from a reliable source (some1 close the 'Hawks nest') whom he is unwilling to disclose to us. For him it is valuable information.

He was asking if any1 else with a possibly, but not necessarily different, equally reliable source (in their opinion), was able to shed any light on the 'rumor' he was hearing to help him decide whether to act on his information for SC reasons.

If he had an actual source, like a media release, then why would he have posted to help him in this decision? o.0

[devize]

Devize.   I was telling u all along it was not just speculation it was from close to hawks nest.

Dude, I don't know why I even bother. You clearly have no understanding of what speculation is. When you have no actual information, no sources, no evidence apart from a few whispers at the 'hawks nest' IT IS STILL SPECULATION. You were SPECULATING that Mitchell would be out based on rumours. That's it.

It was never about being wrong or right, I never said he was going to play or not. I was just saying that everything you said was pure speculation. Sure, it turned out to be true but that doesn't change anything. If you had created the thread today, with actual sources, then it wouldn't be just speculation.

Speculation is a thought based off zero information.

For you it's speculation, because you're hearing it from an unreliable source, that being tigertops ( a random poster on a footy site). For you that is zero information.

For Tigertops it's not speculation 'cause he's hearing it from a reliable source (some1 close the 'Hawks nest') whom he is unwilling to disclose to us. For him it is valuable information.

He was asking if any1 else with a possibly, but not necessarily different, equally reliable source (in their opinion), was able to shed any light on the 'rumor' he was hearing to help him decide whether to act on his information for SC reasons.

If he had an actual source, like a media release, then why would he have posted to help him in this decision? o.0

Speculation doesn't necessarily have to be based off zero information. In can be based off incomplete information. A rumour from someone close to the 'hawks camp' is not solid information and if it were, why would he be posting here to ask for other opinions if he thought his source was so reliable?

'im asking if anyone else has any info.' That doesn't sound like he believed his source was reliable enough to be deemed as complete information, so it's just speculation.

[Ziplock]

he's not going to say it's a definite source of accurate information cause he heard it off someone, because people like you would go off at him. So he says he's heard this rumour, from what he believes is a reliable source, and does anyone have anything to back it up for the general public who won't believe an anonymous contributor?

and his source was right. So I dunno what you're getting all up about mate. What he did was completely logical and justifiable.