Main Menu

AXVs: Official Drafts

Started by Colliwobblers, August 13, 2012, 06:19:17 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

tbagrocks

#5550
Pick 97. Nails - Jack Redpath - Jack Redpath
Pick 98. KoopKicka - Levi Greenwood
Pick 99. Tor01doc - Com Richardson
Pick 100. Nostradamus - Ciaran Kilkenny
Pick 101. KoopKicka - Justin Hoskin
Pick 102. Tor01doc - Joel Patful
Pick 103. Maca24 - Mitchell Brown
Pick 104. Maca24 - Aaron Black
Pick 105. Nostradamus - Eric Wallace
Pick 106. Noz - Lincon McCarthy
Pick 107. Tor01doc - Jason Blake
Pick 108. Colliwobblers - Andrew McInnes
Pick 109. Monstrom - Luke Thompson
Pick 110. Jayman - Aaron Davey
Pick 111. Noz - Dane Rampe
Pick 112. Tor01doc - Cameron Sutcliffe
Pick 113. BB67TH -
Pick 114. Jayman -
Pick 115. Picker_man -
Pick 116. Nails -
Pick 117. Maca24 -
Pick 118. Maca24 -
Pick 119. Tbagrocks -
Pick 120. Adamant -
Pick 121. Whatlez -
Pick 122. Maca24 -
Pick 123. Tor01doc -
Pick 124. KoopKicka -
Pick 125. Jayman -
Pick 126. Tor01doc -
Pick 127. KoopKicka -

Noz

Damn I wish I had another pick

BB67th

With our last pick we will have Lewis Roberts-Thomson.

Jay


tor01doc

Welcome back speedie J.  ;)

Happy New Year to you all too!

2013 - year of the Hawk?

tbagrocks

Quote from: tor01doc on January 01, 2013, 02:41:47 AM
Welcome back speedie J.  ;)

Happy New Year to you all too!

2013 - year of the Hawk?


Unless they are really burning from the loss, I can't see them getting much better compaired to others

tor01doc

Hey, how did that little laughing guy get into the copy of my most serious post?

tbagrocks


KoopKicka

Checking in from Canada, hows everyone going? 7 hours until New Years! :D

Colliwobblers

Quote from: tbagrocks on January 01, 2013, 11:03:10 AM
Pretty clever isn't it

Sorry guys I'm flat out the next and past few days.

Not much to do Tbag is doing a great job keeping the list updated. I'll update all pick lists soon and be around to open trade window when this draft finishes.

Make sure you all know your lists, I sent a pm to 3 coaches who's lists are not accurate on the first page of this thread. everyone elses seem to be spot on but double check to make sure before you start trading that your list matches the list on the front page of this draft thread, which i will transfer to the trade thread prior to opening the trade period #2.

Thanks for keeping the list up to date in the thread tbag.

picker_man

I forgot sorry CW :P

I was just trying to work it out and dont get it though :-[ How many players are we meant to have??

We have 37 players from initial draft and Nat draft + our first 3 rookie picked players are on the front page list to take it to 40. We then have another 6 rookie picked players still to be added making it 46 isn't that right or am i missing something??


*and waiting to let Toga pick so you can skip us until he comes on if ya's want, thats cool 8)

tbagrocks

                   

Colliwobblers

Quote from: picker_man on January 01, 2013, 06:03:48 PM
I forgot sorry CW :P

I was just trying to work it out and dont get it though :-[ How many players are we meant to have??

We have 37 players from initial draft and Nat draft + our first 3 rookie picked players are on the front page list to take it to 40. We then have another 6 rookie picked players still to be added making it 46 isn't that right or am i missing something??


*and waiting to let Toga pick so you can skip us until he comes on if ya's want, thats cool 8)

We drafted the following. Rules were changed to mean you make up your senior and rookie list (THIS SEASON) with whichever players you choose.

Initial Draft: 36

National Draft: 4

Rookie/PS Draft: 6

Your senior list = 40 players

Your Rookie list = 6 players ( none of whom can play until you have a long term injured senior listed player )

Total Players on List = 46

Toga

Sorry fellas, FF was down for me all day :-X

Mongolian Lambs take Jay van Berlo with pick 115.

tbagrocks

Think everyone had that problem Togs

Also, on the Rookie listed players CW, what determans an LTI? Say a player's out for 4 weeks compaired to 10 plus weeks? We might need to clarify this rule?