is it worth...

[me]

playing clay smith over tom rockliff this week?

let's face it, he's absolutely showerhouse, and if i had any trades i'd turf him for just about anybody - with the crows coming up this week, don't think he can break 50-60

[Ajax22]

No

[LaHug]

I'm considering the same thing but you just can't do it... Rockliff is more likely to outscore Clay on any given week than not to.

[me]

yeah i've been waiting on the spud to start scoring well all year, but he just consistently pumps out dirty little 60s and 70s while other ppl i'm playing against have other non-spud midfielders (ie: just about anyone else) who get 100s all the time

i'm just so sick of him, my dt year is done and dusted, he's playing the crows this week and he's shown that he can only ton up against tanking/utterly non-competitive teams like goldcoast/giants/dogs

doesn't help that michael "how do i still have the job after x years of disappointment/mismanagement/general cluelessness" voss is coaching in his defense i spose

/end rant lol

[LaHug]

WOW! Just noticed that Geelong (136) and Hawthorn (100) are the only two teams outside of the bottom 4 that he's scored a ton on! Fortunately, after Adelaide next week, he's got Port (hasn't played them but 5th last) and Bulldogs (141) to go. Still, it might actually be worth considering playing Clay this week! Well, it would be if he weren't playing the Swans... Thinking both may go under the 70 mark this week :(

[Fireballz]

Back in Rocky mate. I'm putting him down for 97, strike me down if I'm wrong ;)