Main Menu

Waters

Started by no eye deer, August 11, 2012, 07:43:09 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

no eye deer

Traded out Lake for you this week. flowering 50? WTF? I'm sure Lake will smash out a ton now! I think this has happened to every premium I've traded in this year. I'm looking at you Sidey, Thompson, Goodes, Danger! At least MOST of you have come good. ( still looking at you Adam!) Rant over!  :)

roo boys!

Thankyou Waters,  thankyou :D League opponent had you this week and last time I played him you were the difference. It was looking bad for me when NicNat pulled out a 150 (rigged :P) but was glad to see my Selwood/Priddis combo beat his NicNat/Waters. Only just, but still a win!

woofy

Did the same trade dammit. last week brought in birchall and he scores a 66! bloody hell.

disco1992

Quote from: roo boys! on August 11, 2012, 09:03:17 AM
Thankyou Waters,  thankyou :D League opponent had you this week and last time I played him you were the difference. It was looking bad for me when NicNat pulled out a 150 (rigged :P) but was glad to see my Selwood/Priddis combo beat his NicNat/Waters. Only just, but still a win!
Just watching the game at subi, nic nat had a huge influence throughout most of the game

roo boys!

Quote from: disco1992 on August 11, 2012, 11:25:49 AM
Quote from: roo boys! on August 11, 2012, 09:03:17 AM
Thankyou Waters,  thankyou :D League opponent had you this week and last time I played him you were the difference. It was looking bad for me when NicNat pulled out a 150 (rigged :P) but was glad to see my Selwood/Priddis combo beat his NicNat/Waters. Only just, but still a win!
Just watching the game at subi, nic nat had a huge influence throughout most of the game
Yeah I know, the :P indicates I was joking...but still think he got a bit too much added on. Of course if I had him then it would be a completely different story, I'm very very very biased.

Turkies

I think it was more of a joke that Big-O got 93. He was absolutely trampled on by Cox/Nat, had hardly any influence, yet scores as much as players like Enright/Gaff/Scooter.

Any back on topic, was loving Waters' score :) Went with scotland over him in DT, and in SC my opponent has him

KoopKicka

Gah I did the same trade, will probably mean I lose my qualifying final. :/

fever

i thought waters took a lot of marks from opp kicks and then kicked long most of the time. i was surprised by his score (thought it was more an 80-90pt game)

Mat0369

#8
Quote from: disco1992 on August 11, 2012, 11:25:49 AM
Just watching the game at subi, nic nat had a huge influence throughout most of the game

He and Cox were both amazing. That goal from the Cox spoil on Stevie J which went down the other end and was made up of second efforts from Nic Nat and the Big Q was amazing.

Quote from: fever on August 11, 2012, 12:59:45 PM
i thought waters took a lot of marks from opp kicks and then kicked long most of the time. i was surprised by his score (thought it was more an 80-90pt game)

Also butchered the pill a fair bit from what I remember (direct clangers)

LF

Waters had very poor disposal went missing for awhile I did not expect a good score from him.

tigertops

Might be a good pickup next week with his drop u would think

roo boys!

Quote from: tigertops on August 11, 2012, 04:51:11 PM
Might be a good pickup next week with his drop u would think
Not going to drop too much, had a BE of 66. If he has another down one could be good in a couple of weeks though.

CrowsFan

#12
Quote from: luvfooty on August 11, 2012, 01:39:35 PM
Waters had very poor disposal went missing for awhile I did not expect a good score from him.
Had 77% disposal efficiency. Plus 2 inside 50's and 2 rebound 50's. That's pretty good really