options

[EZA100]

don't know which two to get rid of?

[Spinking]

If it is as simple as that - Id say Lake and Brown based on probably being the lowest scorers, greatest potential to go missing and also particularly with Brown - many better options available on that line.

[nostradamus]

we really need to see your team to give you an informed decision

[EZA100]

If it is as simple as that - Id say Lake and Brown based on probably being the lowest scorers, greatest potential to go missing and also particularly with Brown - many better options available on that line.

yeh i was planning on getting rid of brown to fyfe, then i have treloar and gunston who are inform who are on the bench so will probably get rid of one of them soon.

[EZA100]

we really need to see your team to give you an informed decision

DEF - GODDARD, SHAW, LAKE, CARRAZZO, HANLEY, BIRCHALL, YARREN, ELLIS, L.BROWN
MID - ABLETT, KENNEDY, BARLOW, WARD, HAYES, PENDLEBURY, MILES, GIBSON
RUC - JACOBS, NAITANUI, JENKINS, PATTISON
FWD - FRANKLIN, ROBINSON, ZORKO, MARTIN, DANGERFIELD, GOODES, J.BROWN, GUNSTON, TRELOAR
$143K LEFT

[Windigo]

Lake can still turn in on, but those days seem to be scarce given how poorly the Dogs are playing.

I'd boot Brown>Fyfe. Like you said.

[Ajax22]

You could really do with another topline mid in there, guessing Swans out of reach but bringing in someone like Watson or Thompson could really help. Out if those mids I would probably lose Kennedy, he just hasn't been scoring well enough for a while now.

After that getting rid of either Lake or Brown would be the go, leaning towards losing Brown but either would work