BEST MIDFIELDER OUT THERE?

Started by Goolahbah, July 27, 2012, 07:52:36 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Who to pick...

Greene --> Swan
10 (21.3%)
Greene --> Pendlebury
28 (59.6%)
Greene --> Watson
5 (10.6%)
Greene --> Other (specify)
1 (2.1%)
Hold and reevaluate next week (Swan's Be is 131, Greene's 85)
3 (6.4%)

Total Members Voted: 4

Goolahbah

6 trades, $172,000


Who should I upgrade greene for? I have enough money for anyone (was thinking swan then pendlebury)
Also thinking of trading out hall to baguley and moving smedts to fwd line to limit donuts (I don't need the cash).


Back
God, Scot, Deledio, Adcock, Birchall, Dempsey,Yarran (smedts, shaw)

Mid
thompson, ablett, Hayes, Priddis, S selwood, greene (gibson,couch)

Ruck
Cox Jacobs (redden, campbell)

Fwd
Franklin, Sidebottom, N Roo, Pav, Johnson, Harvey, Zorko (hall sexton)

I still have sexton though.....



Spinking

Get Swanny. Permanent captain option, will look good in that midfield.

Edge

what about beams? could be a great p.o.d in finals

Colliwobblers

Swan, pendles has proved a better SC scorer than Swan.... until this season.

Goolahbah

So far I have made the trade to swan but am hovering over the reverse...

How come Pendlebury has got so many more votes?

Quote from: Edge on July 27, 2012, 08:02:32 PM
what about beams? could be a great p.o.d in finals

Mmm if I traded to swan and baguley this week I would still have 189,000 (enough to say upgrade zorko/harvey/etc come finals)

Colliwobblers

pendles has the votes because traditionally he is a better scorer in SC than Swan just like i said. But is that the case this season?

no

Goolahbah

Quote from: Colliwobblers on July 27, 2012, 08:18:35 PM
pendles has the votes because traditionally he is a better scorer in SC than Swan just like i said. But is that the case this season?

no

Yeah sorry I did read your post but still didn't think that warranted 4 extra votes...

Is that because Swan used to get cheap possies?

Colliwobblers

nothing to be sorry for :)

pendles uses the ball better and SC punishes klangers and rewards effective possessions.

Swan had improved his ball use AND is getting so much of it that he is also deciding game results which is also given weight in the SC scoring system.

JamSainter


Goolahbah

Quote from: Colliwobblers on July 27, 2012, 08:27:09 PM
nothing to be sorry for :)

pendles uses the ball better and SC punishes klangers and rewards effective possessions.

Swan had improved his ball use AND is getting so much of it that he is also deciding game results which is also given weight in the SC scoring system.

Yeah true.... Thanks I will be going Swan

Quote from: JamSainter on July 27, 2012, 08:27:20 PM
Pendlebury hands down.

Mate why? Explain your reasoning.... I'm likely to go Swan because Colliwobblers has explained reasoning

Colliwobblers

pendles was the highest SC scoring mid last season.

he had the lowest differential of any player in the comp.

2011 Games Log for Scott Pendlebury (Collingwood Magpies)
   
Description    Date    Opponent       K    HB    D    M    G    B    T    HO    GA    GC    I50    FF    FA    DT    SC
Grand Final    1st Oct    Geelong        20    13    33    4    0    0    7    1    0    0    4    4    0    131    143
Preliminary Final    23rd Sep    Hawthorn     18    14    32    2    0    3    3    1    0    0    7    2    1    103    118
Qualifying Final    10th Sep    West Coast   19    19    38    5    0    1    6    0    0    0    7    3    0    138    140
Round 24    2nd Sep    Geelong    L    15    15    30    2    1    0    4    1    0    1    0    2    0    106    135
Round 23    26th Aug    Fremantle        17    19    36    7    2    0    5    0    2    4    2    3    0    145    154
Round 22    20th Aug    Brisbane        15    15    30    3    0    1    2    0    0    0    3    1    0    94    108
Round 21    12th Aug    St Kilda        15    11    26    5    1    0    6    0    0    1    2    1    2    107    102
Round 20    6th Aug    Port Adelaide     15    16    31    1    1    0    9    0    0    1    4    1    1    120    133
Round 19    31st Jul    Essendon       13    19    32    2    3    0    10    0    3    6    7    3    1    141    160
Round 18    23rd Jul    Gold Coast       12    22    34    5    2    0    5    0    2    4    5    0    1    124    123
Round 17    16th Jul    Carlton        16    10    26    4    2    1    7    0    1    3    3    2    0    123    145
Round 16    10th Jul    North Melbourne   12    17    29    2    0    0    7    0    3    3    3    3    0    107    160
Round 15    3rd Jul    Hawthorn        14    16    30    4    0    1    5    0    1    1    3    1    1    105    119
Round 14    25th Jun    Sydney        14    11    25    4    1    0    7    0    1    2    7    0    1    107    114
Round 12    13th Jun    Melbourne       14    9    23    1    2    0    6    0    0    2    6    5    0    104    129
Round 11    4th Jun    St Kilda       11    21    32    6    0    0    9    0    1    1    2    0    0    129    149
Round 10    29th May    West Coast    16    15    31    7    2    0    5    0    0    2    3    0    0    131    138
Round 9    22nd May    Adelaide       13    14    27    5    1    0    5    0    2    3    6    1    2    103    124
Round 8    13th May    Geelong            8    12    20    3    1    0    7    0    0    1    2    1    1    89    109
Round 6    1st May    Western Bulldogs 14    11    25    2    0    3    3    0    1    1    4    2    0    87    103
Round 5    25th Apr    Essendon             23    11    34    10    3    0    8    0    0    3    5    1    2    166    130
Round 4    15th Apr    Richmond            18    8    26    6    1    0    7    0    0    1    6    2    1    121    132
Round 3    8th Apr    Carlton              13    8    21    3    0    0    8    0    1    1    4    2    1    95    94
Round 2    2nd Apr    North Melbourne 18    21    39    7    1    2    5    2    2    3    8    0    2    141    162
Round 1    26th Mar    Port Adelaide     22    10    32    6    0    0    4    1    2    2    7    3    1    121    120

2012 Supercoach Stats
   
Round    Price    Score    Value
1    $700,500    167    23.8
2    $700,500    127    18.1
3    $700,500    62    8.9
4    $668,900    134    20.0
5    $632,700    140    22.1
6    $613,700    145    23.6
7    $634,800    107    16.9
8    $636,900    147    23.1
9    $641,900    118    18.4
10    $633,400    95    15.0
11    $620,400    -    -
12    $620,400    -    -
13    $620,400    -    -
14    $620,400    -    -
15    $620,400    -    -
16    $620,400    132    21.3
17    $603,700    127    21.0
18    $593,900    -    -

Pendles is VERY hard to go past in SC. I reckon Swan might this seaon but you honestly can't go wrong either way

Goolahbah

Going with Swan (even though he's more likely to be rested at some stage)

Its a toss of the coin but I have Pendles in DT so I think i should give Swanny a chance in me SC haha

The Bomber

Quote from: Goolahbah on July 27, 2012, 08:48:58 PM
Its a toss of the coin but I have Pendles in DT so I think i should give Swanny a chance in me SC haha
Should be the other way around champ. Swanky should be in your dt and Pendles in your SC. A bit late but Pendles because he was amazing last year and the year before that and the year before that and doesn't require 40+ possessions to get 140+ ...

Goolahbah

Quote from: The Bomber on July 27, 2012, 10:30:45 PM
Quote from: Goolahbah on July 27, 2012, 08:48:58 PM
Its a toss of the coin but I have Pendles in DT so I think i should give Swanny a chance in me SC haha
Should be the other way around champ. Swanky should be in your dt and Pendles in your SC. A bit late but Pendles because he was amazing last year and the year before that and the year before that and doesn't require 40+ possessions to get 140+ ...

Yeah but I picked pendles in DT because I didn't think swan was worth the extra cash (which I needed) and always trusted him more

Jay

Id go pendles...so consistent...only had like 1 bad game (carrots tagged him) in the last 2 years! Also less chance of a rest due to his fairly long sting on the sidelines a couple of weeks ago