SC scoring - influence on game

NFI Police · July 22, 2012, 10:41:53 AM

Watched the Pies v Hawks game yesterday and enjoyed seeing a game of AFL without any real tags of the quality players. However I am a little bemused by the fact that Heath Shaw scored 100+ in supercoach. Lewis kicked 5 goals on him and then he switched to breust who kicked a few more. Dont think Heater gets too many contested ball, is Ray Shaw working for champion data now?

afl_freak2 · July 22, 2012, 11:08:18 AM

champion data just make shower up! have a look at zorkos score............71 dream team and 115 supercoach wtf???? by no means did zork had a that good of a game! sc is just a lottery! whoever has a half decent side and gets the rub of the green with sc spastic scoring will get a good ranking.

KoopKicka · July 22, 2012, 11:27:09 AM

Theres no way Shaw shouldve gotten a ton. ::)

tor01doc · July 22, 2012, 11:36:30 AM

I am glad he did though! :P

The Bomber · July 22, 2012, 11:48:59 AM

Quote from: afl_freak2 on July 22, 2012, 11:08:18 AM
champion data just make shower up! have a look at zorkos score............71 dream team and 115 supercoach wtf???? by no means did zork had a that good of a game! sc is just a lottery! whoever has a half decent side and gets the rub of the green with sc spastic scoring will get a good ranking.

Zorko got quite a few possessions, hard ball gets etc with effective disposals in the last 10 minutes of the 4th qtr. SC points are just thrown at players at that stage in the game...

Shaw didn't deserve 100+ but glad he did

afl_freak2 · July 22, 2012, 12:16:18 PM

no zorkos score was through the roof in the first and 2nd qtr......... if anything his 4th qtr is where he didnt score as well.

afl_freak2 · July 22, 2012, 12:17:44 PM

115 for zorko............... swan and gaj should have scored 200! SIMPLE!

Vicious Sandwhich Attack · July 22, 2012, 12:45:04 PM

Quote from: afl_freak2 on July 22, 2012, 12:16:18 PM
no zorkos score was through the roof in the first and 2nd qtr......... if anything his 4th qtr is where he didnt score as well.

It was odd, he was keeping up with GAJ until 1/2 way through the third quarter. I was curious as to why, during the second quarter and all I can out it down to was the three GA's he had up until then. It was a close, low scoring game at that point and I assume 80% the reason Zorko was scoring highly!

3 GA's from 5 goals at that point has to be considered significant doesn't it - Reading it from a stats perspective he kept the lions in it?

(NB - Didn't see the game)

felsty · July 22, 2012, 02:02:08 PM

Quote from: afl_freak2 on July 22, 2012, 12:17:44 PM
115 for zorko............... swan and gaj should have scored 200! SIMPLE!

Lot of his disposals were inside 50 effective kicks with heaps of score involvement.. Just check out the goal updates from Monty.. I'd say most of his points came from high efficiency and a lot of score involvements in a tight close game

Ringo · July 22, 2012, 02:13:32 PM

Quote from: felsty on July 22, 2012, 02:02:08 PM
Quote from: afl_freak2 on July 22, 2012, 12:17:44 PM
115 for zorko............... swan and gaj should have scored 200! SIMPLE!

Lot of his disposals were inside 50 effective kicks with heaps of score involvement.. Just check out the goal updates from Monty.. I'd say most of his points came from high efficiency and a lot of score involvements in a tight close game

Watched the game being in Qld and Zorko was as influential to Lions as Ablett was to Suns. Zorko saved gaols at one end and was kicking to targets inside 50. From memory Zorko had a kicking efficiency of 78% so that would have helped as well. 3 goal assists and

Ringo · July 22, 2012, 02:23:10 PM

Quote from: felsty on July 22, 2012, 02:02:08 PM
Quote from: afl_freak2 on July 22, 2012, 12:17:44 PM
115 for zorko............... swan and gaj should have scored 200! SIMPLE!

Lot of his disposals were inside 50 effective kicks with heaps of score involvement.. Just check out the goal updates from Monty.. I'd say most of his points came from high efficiency and a lot of score involvements in a tight close game

Lot of his disposals were inside 50 effective kicks with heaps of score involvement.. Just check out the goal updates from Monty.. I'd say most of his points came from high efficiency and a lot of score involvements in a tight close game
[/quote] Watched the game being in Qld and Zorko was as influential to Lions as Ablett was to Suns. Zorko saved gaols at one end and was kicking to targets inside 50. From memory Zorko had a kicking efficiency of 78% so that would have helped as well. 3 goal assists and 12 contested possessions would also have boosted his scoring. Ablett only had 18 contested possessions as a comparison and 1 goal assist. Swan 20 contested possessions and no Goal assists so the extra 30/40 points for Swan and Ablett would be reasonable.
Shaw is listed as having 22 disposals so that would equate to around 70/80 (depending whether kicks or handballs) of his points so 100 may be reasonable on SC scoring system

NFI Police · July 22, 2012, 03:26:04 PM

How many of shaws 22 disposals were kicking to himself when kicking out from fullback?

coolfugitiv0 · July 22, 2012, 05:25:19 PM

Quote from: NFI Police on July 22, 2012, 03:26:04 PM
How many of shaws 22 disposals were kicking to himself when kicking out from fullback?

Didn't think that counted as a stat? :/

dickitch · July 22, 2012, 07:08:05 PM

i've just lost my round based based on Ellis vs Gibson

D K H M T
24 16 8 6 2 Gibson - 71
21 12 9 5 0 Ellis - 95

North won! HOW? How does that make sense?

Edit: Been normalized to 72 v 90 - but still, ridiculous.

Obese Arachnid · July 22, 2012, 07:12:48 PM

So did that help you win?

SC scoring - influence on game

KoopKicka