Asian 15'S RULES AND SET UP DISCUSSION

[Justin Bieber]

Okay I have a concern with the sub rule. I like it and all... but... what if your captain is the one who gets subbed?

So only 2 weeks of trade periods? What if players are inactive during the off-season?

Ok yeah about the trading, I would enjoy you to give me those players hahah, but you could be the only ruler? Like you decline trades which you think is best for the compeition. I don't like the idea of trade blocking where everyone votes...

[Maca24]

Heres my opinions on the rules.

1. (C) No trade window.
2. (A) If we are to have one, then should be capped to 4.
3. (C) I like 3%.
4. (A) Yes, it should be there to reward higher finishing teams who did the hard work all year.
5. (B) I'd like you to decide Colli, voting by PM hasnt seemed to work so well in other comps. That being said, you would need to allow for some slightly favoured trades, and consider ages and playing time left as well as short term point gain.
Eg of a Trade in worlds that was unfair and got voted through. JP. Kennedy, O'Keefe and Cotchin for J.McVeigh, S.Hill and R.Murphy. Thats just blatant robbery and has somewhat affected the competition.
6. (B) Should make the competition more interesting with VC bonuses.
7. (C) 8 Movements should be allowed per year.
8. (B) No, you get what position you are given.
9. (A) No sub rule please, makes the game really complicated.

[picker_man]

oh sweet! yeah i was doing some research and unless you get the top 5 players there's like 20 who all average the same. So getting two of that 20 is prolly better then getting one guy ave a bit higher. so i actually like being near the bottom and now we get early picks each round of nat / rookie drafts extremely happy being near the bottom ;D

[Justin Bieber]

oh sweet! yeah i was doing some research and unless you get the top 5 players there's like 20 who all average the same. So getting two of that 20 is prolly better then getting one guy ave a bit higher. so i actually like being near the bottom and now we get early picks each round of nat / rookie drafts extremely happy being near the bottom ;D

THIS!

[tbagrocks]

Just don't take the two I want >:(

[Justin Bieber]

Just don't take the two I want >:(

I might take Tex round one.

[Maca24]

Just don't take the two I want >:(

I might take Tex round one.

Tex Walker? I'm taking him with pick 5 you fools.

[tbagrocks]

 >:(

[Justin Bieber]

Just don't take the two I want >:(

I might take Tex round one.

Tex Walker? I'm taking him with pick 5 you fools.

Not sure if srs ??? But he would be a decent round 2-3 pick.

[tbagrocks]

Just don't take the two I want >:(

I might take Tex round one.

Tex Walker? I'm taking him with pick 5 you fools.

Not sure if srs ??? But he would be a decent round 2-3 pick.

I agree a nice third round pick ;)

[Colliwobblers]

Okay I have a concern with the sub rule. I like it and all... but... what if your captain is the one who gets subbed?

So only 2 weeks of trade periods? What if players are inactive during the off-season?

Ok yeah about the trading, I would enjoy you to give me those players hahah, but you could be the only ruler? Like you decline trades which you think is best for the compeition. I don't like the idea of trade blocking where everyone votes...

1. If your captain gets subbed and you choose to use your sub under the sub rule, then your sub scores 200%. Acts as i the sub has come on and taken over the captaincy :)

under the captain rule ( whether we go vice captain 150% or not there is cover for the captain ONLY if he does not play at all - and this cover is from a playner NAMED as cover ON YOUR FIELD)

same as normal fantasy rules, if we do go vc = 150% then there will be a player you name emergency captain and a player you name emergency vice captain, these will both be players named on your field - same as the vice captain works for the captain in normal fantasy rules DT SC ect...

2. trade periods = 2 weeks each. These windows are to be set by the admin at a mutually appealing time/date. Given trades have to be processed and there is most likely going to be an approval / blocking process - we can't have people trading at any time they like outside of the season. Too messy, too hard to control, and without the people required on to either approve or block trades you don't know if your trade has happened or not would just be a mess.

3. On trade approval - i think there HAS to be some form of safeguard against foul play. I am happy for it to be me or a vote by ANY 6 other teams in the competition to VITO a trade seen as totally uneven.

The third option i listed was for there to be the ability for me to over rule a blocked trade if the traders feel that it was blocked by other teams NOT because it wa uneven BUT because it was a strategic move by other teams to try to hurt the trading teams.

For examply 6 teams may block a swan - jacobs (ruck) trade as on the surface it seems uneven, but the team wit hswan may have 7 other gun midfielders and a 32 year old ruckman and 3 young ones that didn't play much the season before.

so while there is a slight advantage to the team picking up swan, there is also a desperate need for the team trading him to get a decent ruckman.

this is where an administrator can then override the trade being blocked - clearly state reasons for its approval, and maybe add a balancer like a national draft pick trade added in to get the team trading swan the higher pick in the national draft.

* there are 3 options in hte poll for us to decide on. No blocking/approval - 6 votes block- or 6 votes bloack but with review by admin

[Colliwobblers]

Heres my opinions on the rules.

1. (C) No trade window.
2. (A) If we are to have one, then should be capped to 4.
3. (C) I like 3%.
4. (A) Yes, it should be there to reward higher finishing teams who did the hard work all year.
5. (B) I'd like you to decide Colli, voting by PM hasnt seemed to work so well in other comps. That being said, you would need to allow for some slightly favoured trades, and consider ages and playing time left as well as short term point gain.
Eg of a Trade in worlds that was unfair and got voted through. JP. Kennedy, O'Keefe and Cotchin for J.McVeigh, S.Hill and R.Murphy. Thats just blatant robbery and has somewhat affected the competition.
6. (B) Should make the competition more interesting with VC bonuses.
7. (C) 8 Movements should be allowed per year.
8. (B) No, you get what position you are given.
9. (A) No sub rule please, makes the game really complicated.

thats excellent that is exactly what we need from every coach. BUT NOT YET :) we may have more to add to the list before it is finalised ;)

[Nails]

"from every coach"

Should PB and I get separate votes or because we're from the same team combine our opinions to only vote once?

[Maca24]

Heres my opinions on the rules.

1. (C) No trade window.
2. (A) If we are to have one, then should be capped to 4.
3. (C) I like 3%.
4. (A) Yes, it should be there to reward higher finishing teams who did the hard work all year.
5. (B) I'd like you to decide Colli, voting by PM hasnt seemed to work so well in other comps. That being said, you would need to allow for some slightly favoured trades, and consider ages and playing time left as well as short term point gain.
Eg of a Trade in worlds that was unfair and got voted through. JP. Kennedy, O'Keefe and Cotchin for J.McVeigh, S.Hill and R.Murphy. Thats just blatant robbery and has somewhat affected the competition.
6. (B) Should make the competition more interesting with VC bonuses.
7. (C) 8 Movements should be allowed per year.
8. (B) No, you get what position you are given.
9. (A) No sub rule please, makes the game really complicated.

thats excellent that is exactly what we need from every coach. BUT NOT YET :) we may have more to add to the list before it is finalised ;)

No worries will add to it as new rules get put up :)

[picker_man]

"from every coach"

Should PB and I get separate votes or because we're from the same team combine our opinions to only vote once?

i might recruit 3 more coaches for voting time then fire em after..........