Zorko good enough for M6?:

[lollipop man]

Unfortunately had already finished off my fwds by the time i got Zorko, so couldn't leave him as F7. I was going to get Pendles for my last mid, but is it really worth using 2 trades to do so when i only have 3 left and Zorko is scoring almost just as well as Pendles anyway? Thoughts?

[Flame]

Keep him as your M6 with such low trades! I reckon you need 3 trades for finals!

[daz77]

Stuck in the same dilemma.
Short a mid and forward line is complete.
I would rather get a full midfield, and then play him over a forward out of form.

[Master Q]

Zorko = Premium

[SydneyRox]

His scoring is certainly premium right now. I am not sure he will be in the top 6 midfielders from today until end of season

[powersuperkents]

He's better than my M6... Scott Selwood... And I paid so much more for my M6 :/

[MLS]

Hold him for now. Scoring like a premo anyway

[Ramus]

Zorko is not a premium, but he is scoring extremely well and there should be plenty of room for him in the forward line, you should have six premium mids by now anyway.

[Chelskiman]

He's better than my M6... Scott Selwood... And I paid so much more for my M6 :/

My M6 is Mitchell.  8)

[Spinking]

He is scoring well enough for the moment, but if you got nervous later on, you could nearly do a straight swap with a more proven premo.

[LaHug]

If you really want another midfielder, trade out a forward and shift Zorko into the forward line. I'm sure you still have someone like Martin who is worse than Zorko (DT wise).
Still, with only 3 trades, I'd just hold.

[mikesguns]

Just sub zorko into your forward line so he is your f7, and sub beams/sidey into the mids so they are ur m6. Same thing just looks better

[powersuperkents]

Just sub zorko into your forward line so he is your f7, and sub beams/sidey into the mids so they are ur m6. Same thing just looks better

Thats pointless. If a dpp plays forward and midfield, you select him for your forward line... It looks bad to even have sidey or beams in your midfield because it'll look like you have a forward there anyway... It like having Deledio or Goddard in your midfield... It just doesn't look good :/

[Chelskiman]

Just sub zorko into your forward line so he is your f7, and sub beams/sidey into the mids so they are ur m6. Same thing just looks better

Thats pointless. If a dpp plays forward and midfield, you select him for your forward line... It looks bad to even have sidey or beams in your midfield because it'll look like you have a forward there anyway... It like having Deledio or Goddard in your midfield... It just doesn't look good :/

+1

Only put those types of players into the mid if you need cover.

[Fireballz]

Just sub zorko into your forward line so he is your f7, and sub beams/sidey into the mids so they are ur m6. Same thing just looks better

Thats pointless. If a dpp plays forward and midfield, you select him for your forward line... It looks bad to even have sidey or beams in your midfield because it'll look like you have a forward there anyway... It like having Deledio or Goddard in your midfield... It just doesn't look good :/

I disagree. Beams is ranked 7th in terms of midfield averages and Sidebottom is 11th (Thomspson is 8th and Mitchell is 12th)
Lids is 6th by the way.

Although I understand having that player in your mids means you have someone who averages less in the fwd line than Beams/Sidebum, it's been handy to have that link available to cover Martin with Beams and i don't really care how it looks. I care how many points I can get!  ;D