ruck choices

Started by higglytown, February 13, 2010, 08:12:30 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

higglytown

whats better 2 mid priced rucks that are getting better every day like ryder and krueser or 1 premium and1 cheapy (not including bench)




Justin Bieber

depends on the cheapie. decent ones in ottens and hille who are coming back from LTI or a seaby or mumford who one of them are going to be number 1 ruck at their club.

2 mid pricers that come straight to mid are tippett and kreuzer. both should improve and worthy of consideration if you go this way.

hope that helps.

nickyt

have i missed something huge because no one seems to be getting on the big cox this year?

Prospector_1

Naita looked great tonight, and ppl are scared after his injury and rests last year.

brent007

I went a premium and a Mid priced. Sandi and Tippet are popular choices.

bunyip

After last night you have to seriously consider Nicnak for the No2 position. I like Jolly for No1 at this time, but I'll see how things develop

Justin Bieber

Nat only scored so well because he was up against bellchambers ::). If Cox plays Nat wouldn't play the whole match. he's got the potential to score big but has to prove himself against a quality ruckman first.

DreamTeamer

I don't know about Hille this year, but I guess you'd be crazy not to get him

bunyip

I hear what you're saying Hell but if I were the eagles coach I'd find a way to keep Nat on the ground. Maybe rest him on the forward line like Geelong do with Ottens sometimes

elephants

i got sandi and charman
people say charman ur joking right but he saved me money and i have lobbe and warnock on my bench so id go premium and chaepy

higglytown

if i take ryder and kreuzer their added average is higher and their price is cheaper than say taking a premium like cox or clark and a cheapy say around the 200 to 250 thousand mark. plus kreuzer and ryder are going to be better this year with a year or two of rucking under their belts

Dedem

i got tippett and krewzer.

tyram23

i want to hear more about kruezer and ryder ppl? because i am having the same dilemma as this bloke atm... i first had mitch clark and nick naitunui... but im now thinkin of having ryder or kruezer and nick nait... im leanin towards ryder though cos his last years average was higher (82) and i think he has more potential.. whats everyones thoughts on ryder?!?! bad choice?? cheers

FLOPITOUT1


tyram23

yes i have ryder? is there something wrong with him?