DT with focus on multi-position players-what do you think?

[Swanstragic]

Here is an effort for your criticism, based on extensive use of multi-position players, to help avoid 0's when injuries start to hit.

Enright, Carrazzo, Kelly, Hodge, Kennelly, Waters, Sheppard (Maguire, Davis)

Bartel (c), Gibbs (vc), Didak, Gram, Dangerfield, Martin (Trengrove, Bastinac)

Kreuzer, Seaby (Warnock, Lobbe)

Riewoldt, Higgins, Franklin, McPhee, Tippett, Ziebell, Mayne (Gumbleton, Tapscott)

I've tried to minimise risks (no Ladson, Palmer), but I'm not totally happy with the rucks, and Waters/Mayne/Sheppard are risks for Rd 1. But I think I'm on the right track with a lot of the other names. Any comments or suggested improvements?   

[Paddy13]

Pretty good, but I'm not liking seaby, waters and gram as a mid!
Ur on the right track though

[Swanstragic]

Thanks Paddy13. Yeah, I'd love to have the money to have a better second ruck tham Seaby. Maybe downgrade Didak to Pavlich, downgrade Gram to Hodge or Carrazzo and put in another decent defender like Fisher......but it's so hard to find all the cash needed to do the things you want to do.

[FLOPITOUT1]

If your going to have Patty put him in your forward line any player thats a mid is gold in your back or forward lines.Gram in the backline if you want him. imo