Giles to Mummy

[C-Dogg]

Seriously is this going to be one of the most popular sideways trade in the next 2 weeks?

For me its a no brainer, yes or no people

[Windigo]

I'd be cautious.

Mumford has had trouble with his back and seemed a bit sore last week.

I'd go Cox, Maric  or Griffin. ;)

[Grazz]

Mummy hurt his back in th 4th qtr last weekend and looked sore getting up. I honestly think Mummy is a risk considering whats gone on with rucks this year the move you make now must be the right one for the last time. Mummy to risky in my books.

[Football Factory]

I got rid of him ages ago .. back trouble isnt good .. and like Windy / Grazz said he hurt it again last week but played on. Too risky i reckon

[Fenno]

No way. I have no idea why people are talking about this trade. Has everyone been locked in a closet all year? Does nobody know that he has had back problems for half the year and then went down with a sore back again on the weekend.

[Spinking]

Not sure why everyone is so keen to get rid of Giles at the moment. He's been unspectacular, but effective, and proven to be durable. Only Maric seems more reliable. Just very risky to trade when so many rucks have been in and out this year.

[Grazz]

Not sure why everyone is so keen to get rid of Giles at the moment. He's been unspectacular, but effective, and proven to be durable. Only Maric seems more reliable. Just very risky to trade when so many rucks have been in and out this year.

Its more a case of As your team nears being complete Giles starts to look like a liability. He's been very serviceable we've been lucky with Smith last year and then Giles this year.

[Beard]

I'm going to risk keeping Giles because he's far from being the weakest link in the team.

[Dave085]

Not sure why everyone is so keen to get rid of Giles at the moment. He's been unspectacular, but effective, and proven to be durable. Only Maric seems more reliable. Just very risky to trade when so many rucks have been in and out this year.

Its more a case of As your team nears being complete Giles starts to look like a liability. He's been very serviceable we've been lucky with Smith last year and then Giles this year.

Mumford will be a bigger liability.

[fertalong]

Only trade Giles for Maric, Cox, Ryder, Griffen in that order. You're probably worse off with any other ruckman.

[Mr.Craig]

Mumford will be a bigger liability.

+1

Only trade Giles for Maric, Cox, Ryder, Griffen in that order. You're probably worse off with any other ruckman.

I think you're forgetting Roughead. After all he does have the 4th highest total points and 6th best average so far this year. A better choice than Griff and borderline with Ryder. A good choice if Cox/Maric are cost prohibitive.

[Windigo]

Good point on Roughy there!  ;)

[henry]

Yeah I'm keeping Giles as 2nd ruck until hmac returns. I already have maric and can't see much point in trading giles who has an 80 average.

[C-Dogg]

Thanx for the info, maybe il can this idea all together :)