Last trade of the year.

Started by Proudy1032, June 25, 2012, 03:46:21 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Proudy1032

This is my last decision, last trade I will be doing, and I'm racking my brains about it!

Barlow to Swan

or

Hargrave to Waters

Both will net me about the same increase in ppg, Hargrave to Waters maybe slightly in front. What do you guys reckon?

TheHanger

2nd option, because Barlow has more potential than Hargrave by a long shot, against Essendon Barlow started to get back to top form

Proudy1032

Exactly my thoughts, was on about 70 at half time by memory?
However this leaves me without no swan, is that a big disadvantage?

Fenno

is this the last trade you have or the last upgrade trade?

Capper

Quote from: Fenno on June 25, 2012, 04:01:54 PM
is this the last trade you have or the last upgrade trade?
+1

Surely you are holding on to a couple for injuries

ronl

If you're down to your last trade I'd say don't trade, use it to cover an LTI.  But if you have, say, 5 trades left I'd go to Swan for the simple reason that he's almost an automatic choice as captain.  Waters shouldn't ever be looked at as a captain option.

Proudy1032

Last upgrade trade, strictly last upgrade trade.

Red Dirtie

Quote from: TheHanger on June 25, 2012, 03:59:50 PM
2nd option, because Barlow has more potential than Hargrave by a long shot, against Essendon Barlow started to get back to top form

Im with TheHager on this one!

Hargrave is a spud and has cost me 2 wins because of his late omissions! Not trustworthy! Barlow can produce a cracker hes getting better.

Bak2Form

Quote from: TheHanger on June 25, 2012, 03:59:50 PM
2nd option, because Barlow has more potential than Hargrave by a long shot, against Essendon Barlow started to get back to top form

+1

fertalong

Quote from: Red Dirtie on June 25, 2012, 04:09:38 PM
Quote from: TheHanger on June 25, 2012, 03:59:50 PM
2nd option, because Barlow has more potential than Hargrave by a long shot, against Essendon Barlow started to get back to top form

Im with TheHager on this one!

Hargrave is a spud and has cost me 2 wins because of his late omissions! Not trustworthy! Barlow can produce a cracker hes getting better.

Totally agree. Based on averages, swan will only gain you 20 points a week over barlow and barlow is quite consistent, whereas hargrave suffers from old age syndrome and can get you a few donuts which can potentially cost you dearly later in the year.

Jukes

At least Barlow plays...tell that spud hargrave to flower off like I did.

Screech

i think swan is an abosulte must for DT. you have to ask yourself without which player is your team going to be missing more.

Proudy1032

If any of you are interested he has averaged 97.5 without those 2 sub affected scores and if you take away his two crap Port and Gc games, averaging 104 :) (Barlow)

HappyDEZ

Whilst we would all have Swan in our team in an ideal world at least Barlow can be relied upon to add points to your team. It could be argued that Howard has Hargraves spot too. In that case it would be Waters (90-100)* vs Hargrave (0) & Barlow (105-110)* vs Swan (120-130)*. *Future approximates  :)

Capper

agree Swan is a DT must, but Hargrave is dying. Freo has a nice draw, 2nd best to crows, so stick with barlow and trade HArgrave