British 15's - Discussion thread

Started by MTTY, June 20, 2012, 05:10:04 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Ringo

Quote from: kilbluff1985 on February 21, 2013, 08:03:15 PM
yeah rolling sounds good

any develepment on the trade period Ringo? looking likely/unlikely?
Additional trade period will not take place based on voting it was 7 each of the `14 coaches who have voted so will not go ahead. In westminster system of voting a tied vote is lost.

Justin Bieber


kilbluff1985

Quote from: Ringo on February 21, 2013, 08:45:50 PM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on February 21, 2013, 08:03:15 PM
yeah rolling sounds good

any develepment on the trade period Ringo? looking likely/unlikely?
Additional trade period will not take place based on voting it was 7 each of the `14 coaches who have voted so will not go ahead. In westminster system of voting a tied vote is lost.

so lame just because they don't want to trade ::)

BB67th

I think a rolling lockout would be good. Definitely have C and VC locked in at the first game though.

Ringo

Just to clarify it is not intended to have a full rolling lock out only in Rounds 1, 5 and 14 where comp is split.

kilbluff1985

me so sad already had a trade pretty much done :-[

did you get votes from Colli+Jukes ?

Justin Bieber

I know Ossie was dead against it...

I voted for trade period and same with Pickerman.

Colliwobblers

Quote from: Ringo on February 21, 2013, 10:58:27 PM
Just to clarify it is not intended to have a full rolling lock out only in Rounds 1, 5 and 14 where comp is split.

yeah stuff that. as a fellow administrator i say you can take your rolling "extra work" lockout and s...ve it   :)

maybe disappointing not to have a trade period for Os and Jukes but they liked the list already anyway so not so bad. I wouldn't have minded either way, these things are always contentious especially in a 7-7 vote

can't make everyone happy, not even half the time :)

kilbluff1985

Quote from: whatlez on February 22, 2013, 12:42:21 AM
I know Ossie was dead against it...

I voted for trade period and same with Pickerman.

oh yeah meant ossie+jukes lol

kilbluff1985

who wants to have a friendly match against me this weekend based on DT scoring?

Capper

Quote from: kilbluff1985 on March 08, 2013, 01:25:18 PM
who wants to have a friendly match against me this weekend based on DT scoring?
why cant you use the BXV scoring and do the math?

Kick: 3 Points
Handball: 1 Point
Contested Possession: 4 Points - Any possession won in dispute (Contested mark, hardball get, loose all get, free kick for)
Uncontested Possession: 2 Points - Any possession gained from a team mate (uncontested mark, handball receive)
Tackle: 3 Points
Hitout: 1 Point
Clanger: -5 Points - Any blatant unforced error (free kick against, 50m penalty)
Goal: 6 Points
Behind: 1 Point


kilbluff1985

Quote from: tabs on March 08, 2013, 01:31:58 PM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on March 08, 2013, 01:25:18 PM
who wants to have a friendly match against me this weekend based on DT scoring?
why cant you use the BXV scoring and do the math?

Kick: 3 Points
Handball: 1 Point
Contested Possession: 4 Points - Any possession won in dispute (Contested mark, hardball get, loose all get, free kick for)
Uncontested Possession: 2 Points - Any possession gained from a team mate (uncontested mark, handball receive)
Tackle: 3 Points
Hitout: 1 Point
Clanger: -5 Points - Any blatant unforced error (free kick against, 50m penalty)
Goal: 6 Points
Behind: 1 Point

um cause i'll have to watch everygame to get Clangers wont i?

JBs-Hawks

If you wanna do the math you can play the hawks ;)

Afl site should clangers?

Toga

Clangers would be in the paper's Champion Data stats if you need them...

kilbluff1985

i'd be worried i'd make a mistake using DT just seems much easier