Hargrave vs Malceski

[rowshow]

Which one should i keep. The other is getting upgraded

[andyandy89]

I have them both too, and I am probably getting rid of Malceski.

At least Hargrave is pretty much guaranteed a game each week. Even if Malceski is named I reckon he could be the sub a fair bit given his recent form.

[Lions01]

Have to keep Hargrave, his last 3 games have been poor but i think theres a bit of upside to him.
Malceski is a risk for the Sub as andy said

[Windigo]

I reckon Eski.

It's not like Hargrave is scoring shower & other Doggies are scoring good. There last game was atrocious with only Boyd tonning up.

[rowshow]

i was leaning towards eski he scored 29 as the sub which isnt the worst for a qtr and a bit. the vest scares me. althought hargs has a knack to slut it up when the doggies win.... which in lies the problem

[Capper]

I have Hargrave and am looking at him for D7 if i run out of trades. Eski hasnt been playing well laterly. Not his best game against saints before getting dropped ad being the sub against dons

[dillez]

Take the JS no matter what

[betch ya]

yea keep hargrave