who to chop malceski or clarke.

[Holz]

I have had enough of malceski and clarke and would love to get rid of both of them but sandi going out means i can only drop one of them. Malceski is struggling for form and got the vest after being dropped the week before. Clarke seems to pump out a smei decent score than a poor one.

I was hoping to drop one of them and bring the other in for carrots but with lack of trades im probably going to have to keep one of them and play as D8 with hargreave my D7.

[coolfugitiv0]

I'd keep Eski. He's been pretty consistent apart from a couple of games.
Clarke has everyone taking his piece of the SC pie. Swan, Beams, Sidey, (Shaw and Pendles when fit).

[Holz]

I'd keep Eski. He's been pretty consistent apart from a couple of games.
Clarke has everyone taking his piece of the SC pie. Swan, Beams, Sidey, (Shaw and Pendles when fit).

this is Dt so im not worried about that. Malceski has the potential to improve and push out Hargreaves out of D7, whereas with clarke you know what your going to get will probably play all year and give you a 65 average and be fantastic bench cover. Eski if he is dropped will stuff me up all season if i have him sitting there worth alot but i cant get rid of him.

[Capper]

i have been thinking about this all night.

i havent got eski and now probably wont get him.

its almost like the swans are running a rotation policy with the sub, as no one has had it 2 weeks in a row (i think)
Iwoulg go with hargraves as D7 and Clarke at D8 and whoever looks like scoring more i would play them. This is what i am doing

[coolfugitiv0]

I'd keep Eski. He's been pretty consistent apart from a couple of games.
Clarke has everyone taking his piece of the SC pie. Swan, Beams, Sidey, (Shaw and Pendles when fit).

this is Dt so im not worried about that. Malceski has the potential to improve and push out Hargreaves out of D7, whereas with clarke you know what your going to get will probably play all year and give you a 65 average and be fantastic bench cover. Eski if he is dropped will stuff me up all season if i have him sitting there worth alot but i cant get rid of him.

Oops wrong section, sorry  ::)

For DT, I'd probably lean more towards Clarke for the same reasons you're thinking. Though I don't think Eski will get dropped again, Clarke has a smaller chance to get dropped.

[Nails]

I'd keep Eski. He's been pretty consistent apart from a couple of games.
Clarke has everyone taking his piece of the SC pie. Swan, Beams, Sidey, (Shaw and Pendles when fit).

isn't that the definition of inconsistency?

[coolfugitiv0]

I'd keep Eski. He's been pretty consistent apart from a couple of games.
Clarke has everyone taking his piece of the SC pie. Swan, Beams, Sidey, (Shaw and Pendles when fit).

isn't that the definition of inconsistency?

Bad wording on my part.

He's had two sub-affected games, which we could probably attribute to this:

its almost like the swans are running a rotation policy with the sub, as no one has had it 2 weeks in a row (i think)

And if that is indeed what the Swans are doing, you'd have to think that he's had his turn and wouldn't be subbed again.

and one game where he's just had an off-day. All players have them at some point. One off-day in 10 seems pretty good to me. And I doubt he'll have another like it this season.

Having said all this though, I'd prefer Clarke for DT.