Mitchell v Swan POLL

[Jormas]

Mitchell: Great player, consistently scores 100's and occasionally 130's 40's, VERY CHEAP... His bye is outstanding from here on in: Port, Bris, Bye, Carlton, GWS, Collingwood, Essendon, Geelong, Port, GCS, WCE... PROBLEM: rd.13 bye (1 more donut with GAJ, Hayes sharing the pine.)

Swan: Great team, Great player, amazing scorer, bad draw from here on in. (Hard teams) Expensive.

WHAT DO YOU THINK?

[Windigo]

Swanny doesn't care who he plays against. He will rack 'em up anyhow!  :)

[picker_man]

why make a thread with such dribble in it ::)

mitchell is only making the ton 60% of the time he hits the field, hardly call that consistantly!!!

Who cares who swan plays he will be consistant in getting you a 100 thats why your paying extra for him.....

If you cant determine the difference between swan and mitchell give up ;)

[tbagrocks]

Scotty Pippen v Micheal Jordan!

said that! now this is what this thread is like!!

Mitchell v Swan serious???

[Windigo]

Scotty Pippen v Micheal Jordan!

said that! now this is what this thread is like!!

Mitchell v Swan serious???

I like this example.  :P

[Raiden]

If money is an issue then Mitchell @ a dirt cheap price, will still pump out 100's - if money isn't an issue then Swan for sure, capt material, & can pump out huge tons!

[Jormas]

well, the extra 150K could go along way...

my mids are: Pendles, Hayes, GAJ, Jelwood, Boyd, Horse (JMac, Treloar)
I could go: Pendles to Swan/Mitchell this week, but; the money factor come into play when the upgrades over byes i want to do are:
Morris-> Heater(+170K)
Horsley -> Thommo(+200K)
Hall -> Stevie J (+300K)
Hayes -> Pendles (+100K) after byes
Downgrades:
Clarke -> S.Shaw (-200K)
JMac -> Crozier (-220K)
Bank = currently 380K

So, at the moment that puts me 770K/800K -> +30K.

Therefore, i couldn't really afford upgrade Pendles -> Swan as i would be 50K out of pocket to miss out on maybe doing an Morris -> Heater upgrade.

After that essay, no clue.. Mind blown.

[Justin Bieber]

40's???

[Jormas]

40's???

What do you mean whatlez?

[Justin Bieber]

40's???

What do you mean whatlez?

When was the last time Mitchell score a 40?

[Dave085]

Think he meant 130/140's...

I was going to say no, till i saw you were trading pendles back in. If you have excess trades i wouldnt be against this trading pattern. If you want to save yourself money wait on Thommo, hes going to drop considerably next week and week after...

[Mr.Craig]

40's???

What do you mean whatlez?

When was the last time Mitchell score a 40?

I think Jormas is saying Mitchell is capable of scoring 130's/140's. I hope so at least. :P

[Jormas]

Think he meant 130/140's...

I was going to say no, till i saw you were trading pendles back in. If you have excess trades i wouldnt be against this trading pattern. If you want to save yourself money wait on Thommo, hes going to drop considerably next week and week after...

I have 14 trades, as you can see, only really need to do another 8 MAX..

this leaves me 6 trades to cover injuries for the rest of the season (betting on using 3-4MAX)

Could have enough leway on going Pendles -> Mitchell, only problem is the 4 mids in Byes (GAJ, Hayes, Horse, Mitchell), but trading out Horse to Crozier/SWAN.
But; would you classify having Mitchell as a keeper?
therefore having my final mids: Boyd, GAJ, Mitchell, Thommo (for Hayes), Jelwood and Pendles/Swan

Or, would you prefer a lineup of: Boyd, GAJ, Swan, Thommo, Jelwood, Pendles.

Really want to get Thommo in for fixture and Swan for his scoring ability. At this point, i would need to go Hayes -> Thommo, and Horse -> Swan and keep pendles.

Really stumped..

[Dave085]

Think he meant 130/140's...

I was going to say no, till i saw you were trading pendles back in. If you have excess trades i wouldnt be against this trading pattern. If you want to save yourself money wait on Thommo, hes going to drop considerably next week and week after...

I have 14 trades, as you can see, only really need to do another 8 MAX..

this leaves me 6 trades to cover injuries for the rest of the season (betting on using 3-4MAX)

Could have enough leway on going Pendles -> Mitchell, only problem is the 4 mids in Byes (GAJ, Hayes, Horse, Mitchell), but trading out Horse to Crozier/SWAN.
But; would you classify having Mitchell as a keeper?
therefore having my final mids: Boyd, GAJ, Mitchell, Thommo (for Hayes), Jelwood and Pendles/Swan

Or, would you prefer a lineup of: Boyd, GAJ, Swan, Thommo, Jelwood, Pendles.

Really want to get Thommo in for fixture and Swan for his scoring ability. At this point, i would need to go Hayes -> Thommo, and Horse -> Swan and keep pendles.

Really stumped..

Definately Boyd, GAJ, Swan, Thommo, Jelwood, Pendles. Just be patient, thommo is going to drop again with a break even around 189

[betch ya]

swan in for sure - guaranteed top 3 average, mitchell approx 10th. better options than mitchell, and im spewin cos i started with him. still have faith tho, he'll come good.