Sam Mitchell

Started by Tom_16, May 29, 2012, 11:57:12 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Tom_16

Strongly considering going shiel to him next week. My question is are his best days behind him or is he still a top 10 premo who is massively underpriced atm who will bounce back? Thanks.

elephants

Might need to trade him to Swan to get through the byes...

I just don't trust him anymore... Hodge coming back should help though.

Chelskiman

Two poor games since I got him in, but he would have got 100 had he not given away three frees, so that's a slight positive.  I think he'll come fine.

underdog11

Quote from: elephants on May 30, 2012, 12:05:37 AM
Might need to trade him to Swan to get through the byes...

I just don't trust him anymore... Hodge coming back should help though.

That's a bit harsh ele, I think he will Pick up with hodge coming in, im making a bold move getting him this week, he wi bounce Back don't make long term decisions purely on form

elephants

Quote from: underdog11 on May 30, 2012, 12:18:29 AM
Quote from: elephants on May 30, 2012, 12:05:37 AM
Might need to trade him to Swan to get through the byes...

I just don't trust him anymore... Hodge coming back should help though.

That's a bit harsh ele, I think he will Pick up with hodge coming in, im making a bold move getting him this week, he wi bounce Back don't make long term decisions purely on form

I don't want to really but I can't possibly complete a team without Swanny can I? Also is handy for the byes... I'll re-assess (person out) when the time comes :)

Tom_16

Quote from: underdog11 on May 30, 2012, 12:18:29 AM
Quote from: elephants on May 30, 2012, 12:05:37 AM
Might need to trade him to Swan to get through the byes...

I just don't trust him anymore... Hodge coming back should help though.

That's a bit harsh ele, I think he will Pick up with hodge coming in, im making a bold move getting him this week, he wi bounce Back don't make long term decisions purely on form
Thanks fellas i think i'm sold on him, I'm just looking at an underpriced round 13 premo as it suits me for the byes and he seems a better pick than anyone else.

ShaynoB

To me he just doesn't seem like his normal self. Just not sold on him.

Chelskiman

The Hawks in general are in a slump.  They're a good side though so once they get firing again so will their stars, i.e Sammy, Buddy, Birch etc.

aces-high

I think when hodge comes back he will return to his lofty srandards for sure! The bloke is a star and showed his quality in finishing second in last years brownlow. The hawks have a nice run coming up after an extremely tough early draw and mitch will start churning out some awesome scores. At his price i think he is a must and should finish in the top 6-10 mids come years end :)

Artax

Quote from: Chelskiman on May 30, 2012, 12:11:56 AM
Two poor games since I got him in, but he would have got 100 had he not given away three frees, so that's a slight positive.  I think he'll come fine.

There is something to be said about trusting a man with two first names.. you just can't.

I have a friend called Stewart Scott and I just can't trust him.

nrich102

I'm thinking of getting him after his bye

underdog11

i decided to get him theis week shiel wont smash his b/e and i think mitchell will have a blinder north have no taggers

Shaggy

He'll be fine but he isn't a Top 10 player anymore.

Chelskiman

Quote from: Shaggy on May 30, 2012, 02:16:22 PM
He'll be fine but he isn't a Top 10 player anymore.

He should still be top ten mids.  In no particular order.

Ablett
Boyd
Swan
Pendlebury
Thompson
Stanton
Watson
Stanton
Selwood
Mitchell

I'm backing him to come good, and he can easily finish in the top ten mids.

strikes91

Quote from: Chelskiman on May 30, 2012, 02:44:56 PM
Quote from: Shaggy on May 30, 2012, 02:16:22 PM
He'll be fine but he isn't a Top 10 player anymore.

He should still be top ten mids.  In no particular order.

Ablett
Boyd
Swan
Pendlebury
Thompson
Stanton
Watson
Stanton
Selwood
Mitchell

I'm backing him to come good, and he can easily finish in the top ten mids.