ask the Coaches Round 9

Started by Holz, May 25, 2012, 01:29:07 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Justin Bieber


Holz


LaHug

Quote from: Holzman on May 25, 2012, 08:05:44 PM
Quote from: LaHug on May 25, 2012, 07:40:17 PM
Swan to Stanton and play one of Horse and JMac
OR
Don't trade and play both Horse and JMac?

If there was any question i wish i could answer corectly it would be this one, im asking myself the exact same thing. I originally made this move but after watch dt talk i reversed the trade, the big thing is if swan plays round 11 than it will be a bad trade if you do it.

Its also probably my anti eseenson nature kicking in but 615k for stants seems risky for me despite his form, i can just picture the padlock on him after the game and a 70 score. but playing gws and melbourne he could equally as likely knock up 2 150+ scores. Unforuntunately i cant help much but at this stage i have swan but who knows i might have Stanton as captain in 30 minutes

Yeah, it's such a tough decision. Does the fact that I have 16 trades left make it better?

Holz

Quote from: LaHug on May 25, 2012, 08:25:22 PM
Quote from: Holzman on May 25, 2012, 08:05:44 PM
Quote from: LaHug on May 25, 2012, 07:40:17 PM
Swan to Stanton and play one of Horse and JMac
OR
Don't trade and play both Horse and JMac?

If there was any question i wish i could answer corectly it would be this one, im asking myself the exact same thing. I originally made this move but after watch dt talk i reversed the trade, the big thing is if swan plays round 11 than it will be a bad trade if you do it.

Its also probably my anti eseenson nature kicking in but 615k for stants seems risky for me despite his form, i can just picture the padlock on him after the game and a 70 score. but playing gws and melbourne he could equally as likely knock up 2 150+ scores. Unforuntunately i cant help much but at this stage i have swan but who knows i might have Stanton as captain in 30 minutes

Yeah, it's such a tough decision. Does the fact that I have 16 trades left make it better?

it does but its more the will swanny play roudn 11 issue and the fact will stanton keep it up.

LaHug

Quote from: Holzman on May 25, 2012, 08:29:35 PM
Quote from: LaHug on May 25, 2012, 08:25:22 PM
Quote from: Holzman on May 25, 2012, 08:05:44 PM
Quote from: LaHug on May 25, 2012, 07:40:17 PM
Swan to Stanton and play one of Horse and JMac
OR
Don't trade and play both Horse and JMac?

If there was any question i wish i could answer corectly it would be this one, im asking myself the exact same thing. I originally made this move but after watch dt talk i reversed the trade, the big thing is if swan plays round 11 than it will be a bad trade if you do it.

Its also probably my anti eseenson nature kicking in but 615k for stants seems risky for me despite his form, i can just picture the padlock on him after the game and a 70 score. but playing gws and melbourne he could equally as likely knock up 2 150+ scores. Unforuntunately i cant help much but at this stage i have swan but who knows i might have Stanton as captain in 30 minutes

Yeah, it's such a tough decision. Does the fact that I have 16 trades left make it better?

it does but its more the will swanny play roudn 11 issue and the fact will stanton keep it up.

My current mids are Rocky, Ablett, Selwood, Mitchell, Swan, Horsley, JMac, C. Smith. Is there anyone you'd recommend if Stanton is too risky?

Dave085

This has kinda been asked already but just seeking further opinion..

As it stands i have Horsely and JMac starting in my mids with Treloar as emergency,
Pfieffer and Zorko starting in the forwards with Dickson as emergency.

Does this set up look good - or???
Do you think that seeing as Dickson is not the starting sub i should field him? If so, who for?

Chelskiman

Dave, I'd keep your current set up.  Dickson will need to kick like 4 goals to get a high score as he's not a prolific ball winner.

LaHug

Quote from: Dave085 on May 25, 2012, 08:37:25 PM
This has kinda been asked already but just seeking further opinion..

As it stands i have Horsely and JMac starting in my mids with Treloar as emergency,
Pfieffer and Zorko starting in the forwards with Dickson as emergency.

Does this set up look good - or???
Do you think that seeing as Dickson is not the starting sub i should field him? If so, who for?
I like the look of it. However, if you really wanted to field Dickson, I'd bench Zorko.

chrisuzz

Who would you trade out, Bugg or Clarke?

LaHug

Quote from: chrisuzz on May 25, 2012, 08:41:50 PM
Who would you trade out, Bugg or Clarke?
Clarke. I feel Bugg will be back in good form soon enough and Clarke will likely struggle over in Adelaide (as will a lot of Pies, I reckon).

chrisuzz

Quote from: LaHug on May 25, 2012, 08:43:54 PM
Quote from: chrisuzz on May 25, 2012, 08:41:50 PM
Who would you trade out, Bugg or Clarke?
Clarke. I feel Bugg will be back in good form soon enough and Clarke will likely struggle over in Adelaide (as will a lot of Pies, I reckon).
This is long term, im bringing in Heater

LaHug

Quote from: chrisuzz on May 25, 2012, 08:44:45 PM
Quote from: LaHug on May 25, 2012, 08:43:54 PM
Quote from: chrisuzz on May 25, 2012, 08:41:50 PM
Who would you trade out, Bugg or Clarke?
Clarke. I feel Bugg will be back in good form soon enough and Clarke will likely struggle over in Adelaide (as will a lot of Pies, I reckon).
This is long term, im bringing in Heater
Yeah. Both should be similar long term but, if Clarke does struggle, his price rising will stop suddenly and he may even begin bleeding cash...


My question: Start Devon Smith or Zorko?

chrisuzz

Quote from: LaHug on May 25, 2012, 08:49:30 PM
Quote from: chrisuzz on May 25, 2012, 08:44:45 PM
Quote from: LaHug on May 25, 2012, 08:43:54 PM
Quote from: chrisuzz on May 25, 2012, 08:41:50 PM
Who would you trade out, Bugg or Clarke?
Clarke. I feel Bugg will be back in good form soon enough and Clarke will likely struggle over in Adelaide (as will a lot of Pies, I reckon).
This is long term, im bringing in Heater
Yeah. Both should be similar long term but, if Clarke does struggle, his price rising will stop suddenly and he may even begin bleeding cash...


My question: Start Devon Smith or Zorko?
Clarke fitted better to my byes anyways :)

Zorko has a higher potential but more risk, thats my opinion.

Dave085

Quote from: Chelskiman on May 25, 2012, 08:39:39 PM
Dave, I'd keep your current set up.  Dickson will need to kick like 4 goals to get a high score as he's not a prolific ball winner.

Quote from: LaHug on May 25, 2012, 08:40:20 PM
Quote from: Dave085 on May 25, 2012, 08:37:25 PM
This has kinda been asked already but just seeking further opinion..

As it stands i have Horsely and JMac starting in my mids with Treloar as emergency,
Pfieffer and Zorko starting in the forwards with Dickson as emergency.

Does this set up look good - or???
Do you think that seeing as Dickson is not the starting sub i should field him? If so, who for?
I like the look of it. However, if you really wanted to field Dickson, I'd bench Zorko.

Both got cheers for your answer, however i will boo you if youre wrong! jokes   ;)

Capper

Well done boys, sorry i couldnt help