Dane Swan POLL. keep it simple

Started by its me lads, May 21, 2012, 12:31:31 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

what are you doing?

Trading him (sideways)
Trading Him (downgrade)
Keeping him.

its me lads

so people dont have to read.

sideways is to anyone in his price range

downgrade is only to a rookie

disco1992

depends if 1 becomes 4 i think i can keep him in if it's 1 or 2 will have to see whether to get gary for him next week

kilbluff1985

what about the 'glad i picked pendles' option

Justin Bieber

Quote from: kilbluff1995 on May 21, 2012, 01:33:22 AM
what about the 'glad i picked pendles' option

It's finally paying off ::) lol

Colliwobblers

meh, swan on the bench for 4 is no big deal still the best dt'er to have by the end of the season.

look at it this way if you have most other premiums thier up and down scoring is no better than having a rook on the field covering swan for 4 weeks.

owners of rocky mitchell murphy priddis selwood ect ect ect could have scored more from rooks in several rounds.

I'll be keeping him and enjoying the captains scores that will come from him more often than not when he is back.

4 is really 3 as the 4th is the bye. 3 is a short tem injury and at this point trading him out and back in is madness

Thunderstruck

Quote from: Colliwobblers on May 21, 2012, 02:11:12 AM
meh, swan on the bench for 4 is no big deal still the best dt'er to have by the end of the season.

look at it this way if you have most other premiums thier up and down scoring is no better than having a rook on the field covering swan for 4 weeks.

owners of rocky mitchell murphy priddis selwood ect ect ect could have scored more from rooks in several rounds.

I'll be keeping him and enjoying the captains scores that will come from him more often than not when he is back.

4 is really 3 as the 4th is the bye. 3 is a short tem injury and at this point trading him out and back in is madness

Colly is correct here and I will be doing the same. Have the coverage for him in the meantime and we are nearly half way through the season.

Chelskiman

Quote from: kilbluff1995 on May 21, 2012, 01:33:22 AM
what about the 'glad i picked pendles' option

Or the "glad I held onto Gazza and didn't trade to swan" option.

Jonty21

Keeping him because he will pay you back with big scores when he come back from injury  :D

fertalong

Keeping him because im on 15 trades and don't want to waste a trade now and another when he comes back.

Chopps

Quote from: Colliwobblers on May 21, 2012, 02:11:12 AM
meh, swan on the bench for 4 is no big deal still the best dt'er to have by the end of the season.

look at it this way if you have most other premiums thier up and down scoring is no better than having a rook on the field covering swan for 4 weeks.

owners of rocky mitchell murphy priddis selwood ect ect ect could have scored more from rooks in several rounds.

I'll be keeping him and enjoying the captains scores that will come from him more often than not when he is back.

4 is really 3 as the 4th is the bye. 3 is a short tem injury and at this point trading him out and back in is madness

you probably will cop a few donuts through the byes holding onto him though

Windigo

Quote from: Chopps on May 21, 2012, 03:06:11 PM
Quote from: Colliwobblers on May 21, 2012, 02:11:12 AM
meh, swan on the bench for 4 is no big deal still the best dt'er to have by the end of the season.

look at it this way if you have most other premiums thier up and down scoring is no better than having a rook on the field covering swan for 4 weeks.

owners of rocky mitchell murphy priddis selwood ect ect ect could have scored more from rooks in several rounds.

I'll be keeping him and enjoying the captains scores that will come from him more often than not when he is back.

4 is really 3 as the 4th is the bye. 3 is a short tem injury and at this point trading him out and back in is madness

you probably will cop a few donuts through the byes holding onto him though

+1. I think I may have to move him along.

fertalong

If it's 4 weeks, you need to move him on. Being a hammy, he won't be able to run and lose match fitness, so even when he is back, it could be another 2-3 weeks before he is back in form. It's not worth carrying him through that.

Hopefully there is more positive news on this later in the week.

Windigo

Latest news says only two weeks...Geez, tough decision.  :(

thatguy

Can't see him playing before the bye

Thunderstruck

Quote from: Windigo on May 21, 2012, 05:09:40 PM
Latest news says only two weeks...Geez, tough decision.  :(

hmmm in the same boat Windy, don't know whether to hold or to fire the gun...