Osbourne V Danger

[tony73]

3k difference, who would be better value, being a Crow I would be biast towards Danger, But Osbourne looked OK at the Hawks

[ronl]

I guess a lot depends on the seriousness of Dangerfield's leg injury.  You know we can never believe the tripe that comes out of the various camps re
injuries, they feel they have to hide the truth in case it works against them.  As for Osbourne  he has always impressed me as a tough as nails, plays pretty well, does a good job for the team, but doesn't score well.  As for scoring potential, then, Dangerfield by a mile if he's fit.

[Clint-84]

Danger was back jogging laps today (tuesday) and could be back to full training as early as next week.
Danger has waaaayy more upside than Osbourne!

[FLOPITOUT1]

dang-er "is" the new roo haven't seen potential like this since gibbs imo