Round 5: Live Progression scores

Started by whatlez, April 25, 2012, 06:50:04 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Flame

Quote from: matt1985 on April 25, 2012, 08:06:52 PM
Quote from: Flame on April 25, 2012, 07:50:43 PM
Quote from: matt1985 on April 25, 2012, 07:23:38 PM
231/3

Hate Stanton, can't believe I got sucked in... Sidey looked good, and can't be too mad at Clarke. He has served me well thus far!
I got sucked in too, but his next 5 rounds of footy look pretty easy- big points hopefully! I'm not worried yet. Ask me in 5 weeks!

Lets hope he can reward us over those 5 games Flame! Boyd had a bad one last round, so I guess I can forgive the shower result from Stants. Does hurt seeing everyone with Swan as captain tho :P
I has Swan skipper so it eased the Stanton pain somewhat!! :D

Ricochet

Jeez there's some big scores here
222/2

elephants


Holz

Quote from: LEV on April 25, 2012, 07:23:06 PM
Quote from: Holzman on April 25, 2012, 07:21:41 PM
Quote from: LEV on April 25, 2012, 07:20:01 PM
1/342

Cap Swan, off too a fantastic start !!

EDIT 342/2

2/342?  pretty sure swans only 1 man. i know its double points, but hes only 1 man !!! come on !!! lol :)

did swan score 342 though, how can you compare your scores to someone else if we dont know if you played a captain or not.

Ricochet

#34
Quote from: elephants on April 25, 2012, 08:12:27 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on April 25, 2012, 08:11:52 PM
Jeez there's some big scores here
222/2
Same as me Ric :)
Haha Sidey + Pendles??

Quote from: Holzman on April 25, 2012, 08:12:33 PM
Quote from: LEV on April 25, 2012, 07:23:06 PM
Quote from: Holzman on April 25, 2012, 07:21:41 PM
Quote from: LEV on April 25, 2012, 07:20:01 PM
1/342

Cap Swan, off too a fantastic start !!

EDIT 342/2

2/342?  pretty sure swans only 1 man. i know its double points, but hes only 1 man !!! come on !!! lol :)

did swan score 342 though, how can you compare your scores to someone else if we dont know if you played a captain or not.

I agree, I think we should post scores out of 23 players to include captains and to be more accurate ie 2150/23

essendon2

609 from 4
had Swan as Captain  8) (342), Pendles (113), Clarke (45), Sidebum (109)


devastated about my boys going down by a point though.  :'(

TheHanger

Quote from: essendon2 on April 25, 2012, 08:21:15 PM
609 from 4
had Swan as Captain  8) (342), Pendles (113), Clarke (45), Sidebum (109)


devastated about my boys going down by a point though.  :'(

damn advantage rule!

Macca#23


elephants

Quote from: Ricochet on April 25, 2012, 08:17:31 PM
Quote from: elephants on April 25, 2012, 08:12:27 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on April 25, 2012, 08:11:52 PM
Jeez there's some big scores here
222/2
Same as me Ric :)
Haha Sidey + Pendles??

Quote from: Holzman on April 25, 2012, 08:12:33 PM
Quote from: LEV on April 25, 2012, 07:23:06 PM
Quote from: Holzman on April 25, 2012, 07:21:41 PM
Quote from: LEV on April 25, 2012, 07:20:01 PM
1/342

Cap Swan, off too a fantastic start !!

EDIT 342/2

2/342?  pretty sure swans only 1 man. i know its double points, but hes only 1 man !!! come on !!! lol :)

did swan score 342 though, how can you compare your scores to someone else if we dont know if you played a captain or not.

I agree, I think we should post scores out of 23 players to include captains and to be more accurate ie 2150/23

Yep! Can't complain... yet!

henry

320/3 with Zaharakis Swan and Clarke. With Swan VC that will be 491/3 :)

Binga


Colliwobblers


Cayenne

Quote from: Holzman on April 25, 2012, 07:14:00 PM
not a bad start for me 609/5  swanny was good but clarke let me down

Swan 342
Pendles 113
Sidebottom 109
Clarke 45 :(
Same here.

Justin Bieber

flower you Swan. Hopefully Boyd matches him and doubles it. So he gets 342 and times by 2.

Master Q

436 from 4

517 if you count Swan as VC Loophole...  :D