BEAST OF A START

[MC]

365 from 3 swan vice, clarke and heppall.. gaz to start and C with Shiel as emerg.. loophole perfect!

So 545/3 then really

[HotTiges]

365 from 3 swan vice, clarke and heppall.. gaz to start and C with Shiel as emerg.. loophole perfect!

So 545/3 then really

yeah pretty much.. not good enough?

[MC]

Not bad - though most will be in the same position. I'm on 570-odd from 4 (Clarke, Heppell, Sidebottom, Pendles (VC loophole)

[HotTiges]

yeah happy.. a few in my main league had stants and watson as dedicated capts..

[shuester]

yeah happy.. a few in my main league had stants and watson as dedicated capts..

haha, they probs dont know the loophole then ;D

[Noz]

429/2 not going to complain

[Torress]

very solid start for mine as well -

pendles VC 280, watson 93, ryder, 104, sidebum 104, clarke 70

so counting pendles as captain i'm on 651 from 5

hopefully bust out 2300 plus and i'd be very happy.

even tho i think trading out gazza is ultimately a waste and silly, if you traded him out for swan in the short term is a very decent result.

[Noz]

Those trying to win the weekly it would be very smart. With a start like that trading Ablett to Barlow and getting in another premium around the ground could be nice for the weekly.

[demon_spud]

Those trying to win the weekly it would be very smart. With a start like that trading Ablett to Barlow and getting in another premium around the ground could be nice for the weekly.

+1

Though most would have traded in Stanton for him and suffered. 

Ambulance chasers.

[fever]

if you dont crack 2400 are you going to make a thread with you crying again?

[ben_020285]

3 wickets for 500 runs for me. Pendles, Sidebottom and Heppell.

[Usman]

very solid start for mine as well -

pendles VC 280, watson 93, ryder, 104, sidebum 104, clarke 70

so counting pendles as captain i'm on 651 from 5

hopefully bust out 2300 plus and i'd be very happy.

even tho i think trading out gazza is ultimately a waste and silly, if you traded him out for swan in the short term is a very decent result.

The trade of Ablett --> Swan was a no brainer for me in the hope that swan avg's ~130 a week in abletts absence means you are likely to be gaining atleast 50 points a week whilst picking up a gun at their basement price while Ablett (with any luck) has topped out in terms of price (doubt it). For me it was a long term trade with immediate benefits which are required if you are going to win overall.

[Samm79]

429/2 not going to complain

I have the same Swan Clarke combo, very happy

[tom_scully]

very solid start for mine as well -

pendles VC 280, watson 93, ryder, 104, sidebum 104, clarke 70

so counting pendles as captain i'm on 651 from 5

hopefully bust out 2300 plus and i'd be very happy.

even tho i think trading out gazza is ultimately a waste and silly, if you traded him out for swan in the short term is a very decent result.

The trade of Ablett --> Swan was a no brainer for me in the hope that swan avg's ~130 a week in abletts absence means you are likely to be gaining atleast 50 points a week whilst picking up a gun at their basement price while Ablett (with any luck) has topped out in terms of price (doubt it). For me it was a long term trade with immediate benefits which are required if you are going to win overall.

Good luck getting Gaz back in your team in 2 weeks time. Gonna need to downgrade at least 3 cows to afford a $700k+ player. And if any injuries or suspensions pop up along the way c ya.

[Usman]

very solid start for mine as well -

pendles VC 280, watson 93, ryder, 104, sidebum 104, clarke 70

so counting pendles as captain i'm on 651 from 5

hopefully bust out 2300 plus and i'd be very happy.

even tho i think trading out gazza is ultimately a waste and silly, if you traded him out for swan in the short term is a very decent result.

The trade of Ablett --> Swan was a no brainer for me in the hope that swan avg's ~130 a week in abletts absence means you are likely to be gaining atleast 50 points a week whilst picking up a gun at their basement price while Ablett (with any luck) has topped out in terms of price (doubt it). For me it was a long term trade with immediate benefits which are required if you are going to win overall.

Good luck getting Gaz back in your team in 2 weeks time. Gonna need to downgrade at least 3 cows to afford a $700k+ player. And if any injuries or suspensions pop up along the way c ya.

It won't be any harder than upgrading to any other premium because I have the money I gained from trading ablett to swan in the bank.