To keep my TOP 100 Ranking

[essendon2]

I'm currently 1504 from 16, including Carrazzo's 1 and Kennedy's 41. I have Martin(85), Deledio (100), Magner (85), Boyd (130), Hargrave (75) and Morris (60) to come - all wishful thinking, and looking at around 2040.

I'm currently ranked 97th overall at the moment, 21 trades left after doing Mummy > Sandi & Fyfe > Sidebottom this week as both worked out wonderfully. Putting Swan as C over Ablett also really paid off too 8)

Had a look through the top 10 overall, and most of them have 2 of Carrazzo, Birchall, Fyfe, Goodes and Shaw. Most don't have Swan - and hopefully they all went Fyfe > Whitecross as they all had Robbo and Sidebum already!

I reckon I'll need 2050+ this week to retain my Top 100 ranking,
what do you think?

[MGK1]

Not to sure.. but Swan as captain certainly helps you.

I wonder what the par score will be.. across my leagues most people will just scrape across the 2k

[owenbond007]

nice rank! I got a mate who is 222 and his leading my league, His got 16 r11 bye players im 150 behind so i expect to pass him come bye rounds as it will be hard to turn 8 over. 4-5 max im thinking. 2050-2100 should be enough. Go Bombers!!!!!

[Justin Bieber]

You need 2100+. People outside top 100 will out score you by 50 and move up,

[Colliwobblers]

who knows so many injuries this week you will need to be one of the many there will be that just happen to have none of the injured/suspended players out or at least have strong scoring cover for them.

[Jukes]

I'm thinking 2100 will be a very good (top 1000) score this week. For you to stay top 100 I'd say you'd need 2100, might go up a bit.

Good job in achieving your place too mate.

[Praetorian]

I reckon you'll stay roughly where you are. Most of the poor-scoring premiums will affect a lot of the higher-ranked teams.

Mind if I just play DT vicariously through your team, btw?

[essendon2]

You need 2100+. People outside top 100 will out score you by 50 and move up,

Why would their teams be doing better? who would or wouldn't they have?

[Holz]

im thinking you will fall outside the top 100 if you score under 2150, even with all the carnage i think there should be some decent scores.

2200+ is not out of the picture this week.  There might be some massive 2300+ scores that could catch you if you only get 2050

[Justin Bieber]

You need 2100+. People outside top 100 will out score you by 50 and move up,

Why would their teams be doing better? who would or wouldn't they have?

I'm looking at 2100+

[Holz]

You need 2100+. People outside top 100 will out score you by 50 and move up,

Why would their teams be doing better? who would or wouldn't they have?

I'm looking at 2100+

IM looking at 2200+ :)

[essendon2]

im thinking you will fall outside the top 100 if you score under 2150, even with all the carnage i think there should be some decent scores.

2200+ is not out of the picture this week.  There might be some massive 2300+ scores that could catch you if you only get 2050

mate, there have been no players scoring 100+ that anyone would have.
any decent team would have at least 2 of Carrazzo, Birchall, Fyfe (probably now Whitecross) and Ablett as C

where are you currently ranked?

[owenbond007]

Mate went 265th to 222nd with a 2067 last week think this week is on par with last looking at progressive scores

[Holz]

im thinking you will fall outside the top 100 if you score under 2150, even with all the carnage i think there should be some decent scores.

2200+ is not out of the picture this week.  There might be some massive 2300+ scores that could catch you if you only get 2050

mate, there have been no players scoring 100+ that anyone would have.
any decent team would have at least 2 of Carrazzo, Birchall, Fyfe (probably now Whitecross) and Ablett as C

where are you currently ranked?

my team hasnt been very good im only ranked 10k but i have a very common team. I go against your any decent team would have Ablett captain, if you look at past history and how players peform than swanny was a great choice as captain this week. I had Fyfe but trade him out.

Sandi: not too unique with mummy going down 122
Pendles: 124
Swanny: 134 c
Clarke: now every decent team must have him 95
Robinson: alot would/should have traded him in for fyfe 102
Sidebotom: everyone should have jumped on him 117
Giles: Should be in every team in the comp 101
Waters: way underpriced and would have been traded in to make him more common with shaw out 102

I also had lewis ton up but granted he is fairly unique

I would say they are fialry common and all very good picks.

[Justin Bieber]

I have all of them holz except waters and Lewis.