The "I love Stanton" Thread (applies to a very few)

[essendon2]

flower it, Gibbs has got to go.

or should I keep him?

[frazzles]

.yeah boys, his average now is like 140 or so

[Kellogscrunchynut]

Fraz you have Carrazzo.

[TheHanger]

Got him in DT Pro...VC on him as well...will be happy if captain Boyd outscores him  ;D

I doubt Boyd will pull 180 out the bag
Stanton what a gun, maybe this year he becomes the number 1 DTer

[frazzles]

Fraz you have Carrazzo.

dont remind me

[clucktacular]

Overated, his scores are much too inconsistant.

[Doyle]

Overated, his scores are much too inconsistant.

Still in fairyland? 160-odd in his first then a 110-odd then a 90-odd and now a 175. Nuff said ?

[essendon2]

Overated, his scores are much too inconsistant.

yeah... you clearly don't know what you're talking about...

[TheHanger]

Overated, his scores are much too inconsistant.

yeah I agree, you don't know whether he will score 150 or only 90...

[Doyle]

Overated, his scores are much too inconsistant.

yeah I agree, you don't know whether he will score 150 or only 90...

Buddy, that applies for anyone! Pendles scores 62 after a 122, you could say that he's unpredictable as well.

[frazzles]

Overated, his scores are much too inconsistant.

yeah I agree, you don't know whether he will score 150 or only 90...

Buddy, that applies for anyone! Pendles scores 62 after a 122, you could say that he's unpredictable as well.

i agree with everything youve said id take a 90 from him anyway

[hally25547]

im jumping on as soon as he is tagged out of a game. I reckon his price will be constantly moving between the 500k and 600k mark

[Possumo]

Overated, his scores are much too inconsistant.

yeah I agree, you don't know whether he will score 150 or only 90...

Buddy, that applies for anyone! Pendles scores 62 after a 122, you could say that he's unpredictable as well.

You know that's a pretty silly comment mate... most people posting on here are talking about a players scoring history over several seasons, not just this season (although it's true that things can change and buck the scoring trends of years past). Pendles only had 1-2 games last year where he scored under 100... Stanton had probably 7-10, and he is renowned for smashing out massive scores and then all of a sudden stinking it up as he starts getting tagged or loses form. He killed me in 2010 when I brought him in after an awesome run of scoring, and then ended up scoring around a 90 avg for the rest of the season.

However, I agree he will be a good pickup this season, much like last year, and should score 110 plus. He will definitely be inconsistent though, and the thing with him over any super-premium is that you never know if he going to pull out a 150 or a 60, and for me considering I'm mainly interested in league (read: I have a fairly showerty team that is already way back in terms of overall!), he is a bit too much of a risk for me.

Good luck to those that have him though, and definitely be happy if you started with him. Just a word of warning to those who are thinking of jumping on him at his peak, only to to slip and fall down the inevitable crevasse on the other side!

[grimreaper]

Keep in mind Swan, Pendlebury, Magner and Stanton all clash bye rounds..

[Jukes]

Keep in mind Swan, Pendlebury, Magner and Stanton all clash bye rounds..

I'll have traded Magner out by then, so all I have are Swanny and Stanton.