Going to cop a bit here - would like to be convinced otherwise!

[Windigo]

as soon as you drop coniglio he will probably get 100 :p

This is why I feel it's safer just to hold. Cogs will fire.....Eventually.... :P

I have sense of Deja Vu.....Last year everyone was all over Tom Lynch from GC. Saying he was good value etc. I said I won't be getting him on that basis alone and his scoring wouldn't last. It was 2 games FFS and everyone thought he was god.  :P

I didn't get him and was happy I never did. Also turns out the 'quick cash' he netted wouldn't have been beneficial as you'd be down a trade and a rookie bench option/starter that was turning lack luster scores.

[PowerBug]

oh thought greene was a dual position player. That f$%ks my seady state of mind plans

Use the new trading rules. :O

[elephants]

Having seen gws live down here today, this move doesn't appear to be that bad. Coniglio really didn't have much impact v Roos, while Greene was often used as link out man from back 50m. His disposal was terrible and he turned it over far too often, but he seems to have a better understanding of where to run at this stage to both get the ball and into space.

Okay thanks mate! That's some really handy info! A cheer for you :)

oh thought greene was a dual position player. That f$%ks my seady state of mind plans

Hahah damn!

Wish I kept Greene in the first place, but I'm not chasing after him.

It goes against what I'd do.

Just do it, go with what you think is best.

Yeah, I am going to factor in my personal thoughts before I get others advice a lot more now...

Both trades probably a good idea ... I like the Kennedy trade more than the conigs trade

Same but I see the value increase difference between Conigs and Greene as being pretty huge!

Depends what you think a trade is worth .... Conigs-Greene = 40k + how much he will go up compared to coniglio .. will conigs continue his bad run and will Greene continue his good run im gonna say 80k difference .. 40k + 80k = 120k ... is that worth the trade ? 

Good point. At this stage I feel it's worth it if we take into account the extra 'premium like' scores that we can get if we take Greene over Coniglio.

Greene will be of greater value quicker and therefore can be quicikly made into a premo...

[Football Factory]

Having seen gws live down here today, this move doesn't appear to be that bad. Coniglio really didn't have much impact v Roos, while Greene was often used as link out man from back 50m. His disposal was terrible and he turned it over far too often, but he seems to have a better understanding of where to run at this stage to both get the ball and into space.

Okay thanks mate! That's some really handy info! A cheer for you :)

oh thought greene was a dual position player. That f$%ks my seady state of mind plans

Hahah damn!

Wish I kept Greene in the first place, but I'm not chasing after him.

It goes against what I'd do.

Just do it, go with what you think is best.

Yeah, I am going to factor in my personal thoughts before I get others advice a lot more now...

Both trades probably a good idea ... I like the Kennedy trade more than the conigs trade

Same but I see the value increase difference between Conigs and Greene as being pretty huge!

Depends what you think a trade is worth .... Conigs-Greene = 40k + how much he will go up compared to coniglio .. will conigs continue his bad run and will Greene continue his good run im gonna say 80k difference .. 40k + 80k = 120k ... is that worth the trade ? 

Good point. At this stage I feel it's worth it if we take into account the extra 'premium like' scores that we can get if we take Greene over Coniglio.

Greene will be of greater value quicker and therefore can be quicikly made into a premo...

Yeah dont want to put you off the trade  .. just a bit of food for thought

[elephants]

as soon as you drop coniglio he will probably get 100 :p

This is why I feel it's safer just to hold. Cogs will fire.....Eventually.... :P

I have sense of Deja Vu.....Last year everyone was all over Tom Lynch from GC. Saying he was good value etc. I said I won't be getting him on that basis alone and his scoring wouldn't last. It was 2 games FFS and everyone thought he was god.  :P

I didn't get him and was happy I never did. Also turns out the 'quick cash' he netted wouldn't have been beneficial as you'd be down a trade and a rookie bench option/starter that was turning lack luster scores.

Hmmm true. I also left the Lynch boat. Different circumstances though. Key position forward vs Half back/Wing player...

[elephants]

Having seen gws live down here today, this move doesn't appear to be that bad. Coniglio really didn't have much impact v Roos, while Greene was often used as link out man from back 50m. His disposal was terrible and he turned it over far too often, but he seems to have a better understanding of where to run at this stage to both get the ball and into space.

Okay thanks mate! That's some really handy info! A cheer for you :)

oh thought greene was a dual position player. That f$%ks my seady state of mind plans

Hahah damn!

Wish I kept Greene in the first place, but I'm not chasing after him.

It goes against what I'd do.

Just do it, go with what you think is best.

Yeah, I am going to factor in my personal thoughts before I get others advice a lot more now...

Both trades probably a good idea ... I like the Kennedy trade more than the conigs trade

Same but I see the value increase difference between Conigs and Greene as being pretty huge!

Depends what you think a trade is worth .... Conigs-Greene = 40k + how much he will go up compared to coniglio .. will conigs continue his bad run and will Greene continue his good run im gonna say 80k difference .. 40k + 80k = 120k ... is that worth the trade ? 

Good point. At this stage I feel it's worth it if we take into account the extra 'premium like' scores that we can get if we take Greene over Coniglio.

Greene will be of greater value quicker and therefore can be quicikly made into a premo...

Yeah dont want to put you off the trade  .. just a bit of food for thought

Yeah fair play. Thanks mate :)

[Windigo]

Different player, same explanation=same outcome..... :P

Haha, probably not. But don't listen to me, I convinced people to get Golby.  :P He'll smash a ton next week!

[elephants]

Different player, same explanation=same outcome..... :P

Haha, probably not. But don't listen to me, I convinced people to get Golby.  :P He'll smash a ton next week!

Which is why I am keeping him ;)

[Windigo]

Different player, same explanation=same outcome..... :P

Haha, probably not. But don't listen to me, I convinced people to get Golby.  :P He'll smash a ton next week!

Which is why I am keeping him ;)

Good.  :)

[elephants]

This is surprising? No super strong objections?

[Tom_16]

This is surprising? No super strong objections?

Dickson/hall to kennedy is very understandable and quite safe (i hope). Coniglio to grene is a bit risky but it could well pay off, personally i probably wouldn't do it but if you know what you're doing then go for it :)

[nostradamus]

l'm thinking of getting greene too, but for 5fa..... if he's not named again this week

[elephants]

I think I know what I am doing. Get a better, cheaper rookie so he can be upgraded quicker :P

Fair enough nostra. 5fa was a bit over-hyped...

[nostradamus]

I think I know what I am doing. Get a better, cheaper rookie so he can be upgraded quicker :P

Fair enough nostra. 5fa was a bit over-hyped...

not really sure whether he was over hyped or not, but one thing is for sure.....and thats that he wont make me any money if he's not playing

[Justin Bieber]

I'm backing congs. He will make dough, but not as much as Toby. I will be making two trades this week for sure.