Coniglio Vs Shiel

[Kuruki]

imo, the you spent more money argument doesn't make sense, go with the best option which out of Coniglio Vs Shiel is Coniglio based on that Shiel wouldnt be match fit yet and not that you spent more on Coniglio

My point is if you picked Coniglio over a cheaper rookie then you thought he would score more.. so why would you change your mind after one game .. makes complete sense to me

If you had say Smith Magner Shiel and Coniglio, why would price come into it at all?. Obviously you picked Coniglio over every other cheaper rookie, but that does not mean he must be favored over the other  rookies you also chose. Go with the player who looks like they will score more points. When it comes to rookies, price means nothing. I would chose Coniglio over Shiel this week. He wont be vested. He has a full game under his belt.

I wouldnt have paid more money if i didnt think he would score more .. not gonna have a 175k player that i would think would score more from the begining sitting on the pine after 1 game.. dont know how else to explain it to you .. Example: would you start Kennedy over your premium forwards because he scored more last week

I am talking about rookies not premiums. Coniglio is a rookie, he is unproven like all the other rookies. Everyone picked Coniglio because he was a high draft pick so effectively should be the cream of the crop. Magner comes along at half the price and he is even more of a DT gun then Coniglio. While you continue to pick Coniglio to justify to yourself why you payed more for him, i will pick Magner and my score will justify the point i am trying to make.

[Football Factory]

imo, the you spent more money argument doesn't make sense, go with the best option which out of Coniglio Vs Shiel is Coniglio based on that Shiel wouldnt be match fit yet and not that you spent more on Coniglio

My point is if you picked Coniglio over a cheaper rookie then you thought he would score more.. so why would you change your mind after one game .. makes complete sense to me

If you had say Smith Magner Shiel and Coniglio, why would price come into it at all?. Obviously you picked Coniglio over every other cheaper rookie, but that does not mean he must be favored over the other  rookies you also chose. Go with the player who looks like they will score more points. When it comes to rookies, price means nothing. I would chose Coniglio over Shiel this week. He wont be vested. He has a full game under his belt.

I wouldnt have paid more money if i didnt think he would score more .. not gonna have a 175k player that i would think would score more from the begining sitting on the pine after 1 game.. dont know how else to explain it to you .. Example: would you start Kennedy over your premium forwards because he scored more last week

I am talking about rookies not premiums. Coniglio is a rookie, he is unproven like all the other rookies. Everyone picked Coniglio because he was a high draft pick so effectively should be the cream of the crop. Magner comes along at half the price and he is even more of a DT gun then Coniglio. While you continue to pick Coniglio to justify to yourself why you payed more for him, i will pick Magner and my score will justify the point i am trying to make.

lol .. im playing Magner he is a gun .. if i had 2 Magners i wouldnt worry about  playing Coniglio  :P  .. When i selected Coniglio at 175k it was because i thought he could score more than Shiel and Macca .. so thats who i will be playing  ::)