Coniglio Vs Shiel

[footy4life]

Who gets a shot on the field this week?  :)

[matt1985]

I'm going Coniglio. We paid the extra for him, so may as well field him! He did look good against Syd, hopefully he will gun it this week for us.

[Flame]

Coniglio!

[nostradamus]

l think Shiel will end up the better buy out of the 2, but he can't possibly be match fit yet, so on that basis, field Coniglio

[Windigo]

Go with the player you spent more $$$ on, until Shiel proves you otherwise.

[Jukes]

Coniglio you spent more money on, so go with him.

Meanwhile I'm going Magner on field over Coniglio :D

[Football Factory]

Coniglio you spent more cash on him and he scored more than Shiela last week

[Chopps]

imo, the you spent more money argument doesn't make sense, go with the best option which out of Coniglio Vs Shiel is Coniglio based on that Shiel wouldnt be match fit yet and not that you spent more on Coniglio

[Football Factory]

imo, the you spent more money argument doesn't make sense, go with the best option which out of Coniglio Vs Shiel is Coniglio based on that Shiel wouldnt be match fit yet and not that you spent more on Coniglio

My point is if you picked Coniglio over a cheaper rookie then you thought he would score more.. so why would you change your mind after one game .. makes complete sense to me

[Torpedo10]

Go Coniglio in that situation. I'm going Magnet and Wingard over Clay Smith and Shiel most likely.

[Holz]

imo, the you spent more money argument doesn't make sense, go with the best option which out of Coniglio Vs Shiel is Coniglio based on that Shiel wouldnt be match fit yet and not that you spent more on Coniglio

My point is if you picked Coniglio over a cheaper rookie then you thought he would score more.. so why would you change your mind after one game .. makes complete sense to me

I agree with this, if you have both you must think Congilio is better than shiel. If i had both I would pick Conigs but I have a weird feeling shiel will smash it, i have picked him over D.Smith.

[Football Factory]

imo, the you spent more money argument doesn't make sense, go with the best option which out of Coniglio Vs Shiel is Coniglio based on that Shiel wouldnt be match fit yet and not that you spent more on Coniglio

My point is if you picked Coniglio over a cheaper rookie then you thought he would score more.. so why would you change your mind after one game .. makes complete sense to me

I agree with this, if you have both you must think Congilio is better than shiel. If i had both I would pick Conigs but I have a weird feeling shiel will smash it, i have picked him over D.Smith.

Agree with what your saying Holzman .. i made a decision early on Coniglio so i have to stick with that for 3 or 4 rounds .. but i have a feeling Shiel will score well also

[Kuruki]

imo, the you spent more money argument doesn't make sense, go with the best option which out of Coniglio Vs Shiel is Coniglio based on that Shiel wouldnt be match fit yet and not that you spent more on Coniglio

My point is if you picked Coniglio over a cheaper rookie then you thought he would score more.. so why would you change your mind after one game .. makes complete sense to me

If you had say Smith Magner Shiel and Coniglio, why would price come into it at all?. Obviously you picked Coniglio over every other cheaper rookie, but that does not mean he must be favored over the other  rookies you also chose. Go with the player who looks like they will score more points. When it comes to rookies, price means nothing. I would chose Coniglio over Shiel this week. He wont be vested. He has a full game under his belt. The fact he costs more never comes into it. Look at Magner he is cheaper then most other rooks, does that mean you disregard his 100+ score and go for Someone who was more expensive?

[Football Factory]

imo, the you spent more money argument doesn't make sense, go with the best option which out of Coniglio Vs Shiel is Coniglio based on that Shiel wouldnt be match fit yet and not that you spent more on Coniglio

My point is if you picked Coniglio over a cheaper rookie then you thought he would score more.. so why would you change your mind after one game .. makes complete sense to me

If you had say Smith Magner Shiel and Coniglio, why would price come into it at all?. Obviously you picked Coniglio over every other cheaper rookie, but that does not mean he must be favored over the other  rookies you also chose. Go with the player who looks like they will score more points. When it comes to rookies, price means nothing. I would chose Coniglio over Shiel this week. He wont be vested. He has a full game under his belt.

I wouldnt have paid more money if i didnt think he would score more .. not gonna have a 175k player that i would think would score more from the begining sitting on the pine after 1 game.. dont know how else to explain it to you .. Example: would you start Kennedy over your premium forwards because he scored more last week

[Windigo]

I got in Magnar and I rated him as my M8.

Coniglio at M5 & McDonald M6.

Shiel at M7. I was never going to start Magnar last week.