Port vs Saint Subs

Started by PowerBug, April 01, 2012, 04:35:57 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Praetorian

#15
Quote from: BGK on April 01, 2012, 05:13:01 PM
Quote from: Praetorian on April 01, 2012, 05:09:07 PM
Quote from: BGK on April 01, 2012, 05:05:20 PM
Quote from: Praetorian on April 01, 2012, 04:59:03 PM
Beau Wilkes the sub? Think Watters must be high. Is he going to play him in the midfield, or what?  ::)

What are you talking about?

I'm talking about the substitute. Who according to afl.com.au is Beau Wilkes. Y'know, football?

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/131783/default.aspx

Maybe you should put your reading glasses on.

Calm down Charlie Brown, my eyes are just fine. Clearly just my sources that need a bit of work.

http://www.afl.com.au/tabid/16931/Default.aspx#fixtureid=7668&tab=Teams

Colliwobblers

Quote from: BGK on April 01, 2012, 04:47:38 PM
Quote from: Colliwobblers on April 01, 2012, 04:44:15 PM
morons for not playing ledger hope they lose to port , obviously the new coach has learnt nothing from thier decling success as a result of developing no new talent.

Come on CW. He might be injured.

When they fail to make the 8 for the next 3-5 years you will understand my comments on thier lack of development of young players :)

Zombie2.5

How could they not play the ledgend?
Last minute change Ray in and is sub.

Beau Wilkes isnt even playing :O

TheMailman

Quote from: Praetorian on April 01, 2012, 05:15:49 PM
Quote from: BGK on April 01, 2012, 05:13:01 PM
Quote from: Praetorian on April 01, 2012, 05:09:07 PM
Quote from: BGK on April 01, 2012, 05:05:20 PM
Quote from: Praetorian on April 01, 2012, 04:59:03 PM
Beau Wilkes the sub? Think Watters must be high. Is he going to play him in the midfield, or what?  ::)

What are you talking about?

I'm talking about the substitute. Who according to afl.com.au is Beau Wilkes. Y'know, football?

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/131783/default.aspx

Maybe you should put your reading glasses on.

Calm down Charlie Brown, my eyes are just fine. Clearly just my sources that need a bit of work.

http://www.afl.com.au/tabid/16931/Default.aspx#fixtureid=7668&tab=Teams

you do realise what you linked right?

Praetorian

No, I just mashed the keyboard and by sheer coincidence it came up with something surprisingly related to the topic at hand.

Anyway, the game's started now, and I don't think BGK needs you holding his hand. Just let it go.

elephants

Quote from: Praetorian on April 01, 2012, 05:51:06 PM
No, I just mashed the keyboard and by sheer coincidence it came up with something surprisingly related to the topic at hand.

Anyway, the game's started now, and I don't think BGK needs you holding his hand. Just let it go.

Hahahahahaha, well played!

TheMailman

Just no,

He owned you. Point number 1

Then you say you have a different source (somehow from afl.com). Point number 2

You then post a source which COMPLETELY contradicts your previous statement

You might as well of mashed the keyboard, it would of been more relevant than what you ended up posting

Praetorian

My Christ Mailman.

Strike 1. My source was different. It was from the Match Centre rather than being an actual article, and clearly the article that BGK linked was more up to date. So yes, it was a different source from the same site - clearly, since they actually gave contradictory information.

Strike 2. Nice selective posting, at the time that I linked that source - and you would have known this if you'd actually read my source - I was right, Wilkes was named as the sub. That has since been updated. So you waited forty minutes for my source's information to change before calling me out on it. Hindsight's 20-20 (pun intended).

And needless to say (but I will, anyway) that means that my reading glasses can still sit there over on the table, because I was right. Meaning he didn't own me. That makes Strike 3. You're out, mate.

TheMailman

#23
Quote from: Praetorian on April 01, 2012, 07:55:34 PM
My Christ Mailman.

Strike 1. My source was different. It was from the Match Centre rather than being an actual article, and clearly the article that BGK linked was more up to date. So yes, it was a different source from the same site - clearly, since they actually gave contradictory information.

There you have it, end of story. Stop being a prick.

Bones Bombers

Hey girls if you're finished, why was Redden subbed out, or have you been too busy to know?

TheMailman

Quote from: Bones Bombers on April 01, 2012, 08:05:01 PM
Hey girls if you're finished, why was Redden subbed out, or have you been too busy to know?

lolol good one  ;)

I think he was subbed out because of the combination of 1st game/tall player and he might be a little behind the whole 4 quarters pace.

Bones Bombers

Thanks hope that's all it was, he looks like a good scorer and great cash cow or back up ruck.

Colliwobblers

Quote from: PowerBug on April 01, 2012, 04:49:56 PM
Quote from: Colliwobblers on April 01, 2012, 04:44:15 PM
morons for not playing ledger hope they lose to port , obviously the new coach has learnt nothing from thier decling success as a result of developing no new talent.
I hope you are right CW. :D

And that's what you get for dropping Ledger Saints !  When will they learn they suck they need to bring in new talent.

Great win PB, very happy for Port love the coach he's a champion.

PowerBug

Quote from: Colliwobblers on April 01, 2012, 08:21:12 PM
Quote from: PowerBug on April 01, 2012, 04:49:56 PM
Quote from: Colliwobblers on April 01, 2012, 04:44:15 PM
morons for not playing ledger hope they lose to port , obviously the new coach has learnt nothing from thier decling success as a result of developing no new talent.
I hope you are right CW. :D

And that's what you get for dropping Ledger Saints !  When will they learn they suck they need to bring in new talent.

Great win PB, very happy for Port love the coach he's a champion.
:D very happy that we got a win, wasn't too pleased when Redden got subbed off, but Port comes before the Dreamteam.