DANGERFIELD DOWN!

Started by underdog11, April 01, 2012, 11:39:35 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Justin Bieber

1742 with Gia, hargrave,god, boyd, c.smith. Should get 500 today.

2 large cokes

400. boyd 120, god 100, Gia 75, hargrave 55, smith 50

Justin Bieber

Quote from: 2 large cokes on April 01, 2012, 12:16:32 PM
400. boyd 120, god 100, Gia 75, hargrave 55, smith 50
Yeah probs ont te 500, but wtf, Gia 75? Hargrave 55? What sort of projection is that?

elephants

Jesus Jukes you hate everyone but Bomber players...

Colliwobblers

Quote from: Scrads on April 01, 2012, 11:58:14 AM
Quote from: whatlez on April 01, 2012, 11:52:15 AM
Quote from: underdog11 on April 01, 2012, 11:51:32 AM
Quote from: Jukes on April 01, 2012, 11:46:01 AM
I'm hoping it's true I hate Dangerfield (one of my four most hated non-eagles players) such a stupid pick imo he'll spud it up.

+1. April fools  :'(
No funny. Cause I wanted that idiot gone. 33% of people would be crying.

Whatlez its better this way, if danger went down then people can just jump off easy whereas now they have to grind out x amount of weeks with his spud scores ;) would have been such a dud if he didn't junk it up in the last :(

LOL what like every hawks defender does game long junk it up in defence :)

PowerBug

I have Danger but i was hoping it was true. :(

underdog11

Boyd 115, Hargrave 80, Gia 85, Goddard 105, Smith 75= 450+1742=2192

Goddard 105 + Hargrave 80= 185+2011=2196

winner!

PowerBug

But Boyd will score 150 underdog. ???

Jukes

Quote from: elephants on April 01, 2012, 12:45:04 PM
Jesus Jukes you hate everyone but Bomber players...

He's one of my four most hated non-eagles players! Pendles, Golby, Ballantyne and him!

Football Factory

Can everybody stop with the april fools day jokes    :'(    :'(     :'(     :'(     :'(

Scrads

Quote from: Colliwobblers on April 01, 2012, 12:53:42 PM
Quote from: Scrads on April 01, 2012, 11:58:14 AM
Quote from: whatlez on April 01, 2012, 11:52:15 AM
Quote from: underdog11 on April 01, 2012, 11:51:32 AM
Quote from: Jukes on April 01, 2012, 11:46:01 AM
I'm hoping it's true I hate Dangerfield (one of my four most hated non-eagles players) such a stupid pick imo he'll spud it up.

+1. April fools  :'(
No funny. Cause I wanted that idiot gone. 33% of people would be crying.

Whatlez its better this way, if danger went down then people can just jump off easy whereas now they have to grind out x amount of weeks with his spud scores ;) would have been such a dud if he didn't junk it up in the last :(

LOL what like every hawks defender does game long junk it up in defence :)

Yeah but at least our defenders LOOK like they will score well the whole game ;)

Colliwobblers

Quote from: Scrads on April 01, 2012, 01:03:11 PM
Quote from: Colliwobblers on April 01, 2012, 12:53:42 PM
Quote from: Scrads on April 01, 2012, 11:58:14 AM
Quote from: whatlez on April 01, 2012, 11:52:15 AM
Quote from: underdog11 on April 01, 2012, 11:51:32 AM
Quote from: Jukes on April 01, 2012, 11:46:01 AM
I'm hoping it's true I hate Dangerfield (one of my four most hated non-eagles players) such a stupid pick imo he'll spud it up.

+1. April fools  :'(
No funny. Cause I wanted that idiot gone. 33% of people would be crying.

Whatlez its better this way, if danger went down then people can just jump off easy whereas now they have to grind out x amount of weeks with his spud scores ;) would have been such a dud if he didn't junk it up in the last :(

LOL what like every hawks defender does game long junk it up in defence :)

Yeah but at least our defenders LOOK like they will score well the whole game ;)

I figured i would get a boo for that  ;D

Had to be said tho -  ;) fact is there is NO better side at using the ball than the Hawks ESPECIALLY out of defence, there is a massive gap between the Hawks ball use out of defence and the rest of the comp whatever anyone says, no team kicks in and kicks a goal without the ball hitting the ground or being touched by more than 3 players as often as the Hawks do it, incredible since the rest know how good thier use is and they continue to find space hit targets and get it out with embarrasing ease.

Admit Pies had some key defenders out but it still would have happened for the hawks might have just taken a couple more kicks to a couple more players to get it out (which IMO is even better for your DT)

Justin Bieber

Quote from: underdog11 on April 01, 2012, 12:55:52 PM
Boyd 115, Hargrave 80, Gia 85, Goddard 105, Smith 75= 450+1742=2192

Goddard 105 + Hargrave 80= 185+2011=2196

winner!

I'll take 2192. But Gia could push to 90-95 and Smith could hit 80 since not the sub ;D

Scrads

Quote from: Colliwobblers on April 01, 2012, 01:07:27 PM
Quote from: Scrads on April 01, 2012, 01:03:11 PM
Quote from: Colliwobblers on April 01, 2012, 12:53:42 PM
Quote from: Scrads on April 01, 2012, 11:58:14 AM
Quote from: whatlez on April 01, 2012, 11:52:15 AM
Quote from: underdog11 on April 01, 2012, 11:51:32 AM
Quote from: Jukes on April 01, 2012, 11:46:01 AM
I'm hoping it's true I hate Dangerfield (one of my four most hated non-eagles players) such a stupid pick imo he'll spud it up.

+1. April fools  :'(
No funny. Cause I wanted that idiot gone. 33% of people would be crying.

Whatlez its better this way, if danger went down then people can just jump off easy whereas now they have to grind out x amount of weeks with his spud scores ;) would have been such a dud if he didn't junk it up in the last :(

LOL what like every hawks defender does game long junk it up in defence :)

Yeah but at least our defenders LOOK like they will score well the whole game ;)

I figured i would get a boo for that  ;D

Had to be said tho -  ;) fact is there is NO better side at using the ball than the Hawks ESPECIALLY out of defence, there is a massive gap between the Hawks ball use out of defence and the rest of the comp whatever anyone says, no team kicks in and kicks a goal without the ball hitting the ground or being touched by more than 3 players as often as the Hawks do it, incredible since the rest know how good thier use is and they continue to find space hit targets and get it out with embarrasing ease.

Admit Pies had some key defenders out but it still would have happened for the hawks might have just taken a couple more kicks to a couple more players to get it out (which IMO is even better for your DT)

Honestly didnt boo you for that :P (I rarely boo anyone tbh, mostly posters I dont like, not naming any names ;))

Yeah it is something that I like because it seperates us from the rest of the comp. There were some sizzling plays the other night from defence (not just hawks, pies too). Id be very surprised if games this year are as free flowing/shoot-out types like that one seemed to be. Honestly, I much prefer a 60 v 58 point grind match but both provide quality footy and most importantly, happy with the win ;)