Prospectors YSCC

Started by GoldDigger, March 30, 2012, 11:50:55 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

GoldDigger

You're right, charlie. I'm worried about Milera's JS - liked Stanley better, but not enough $$$.

Saints form has to be a bit of a question atm, given who they've played so far.

charliesheen

Treloar will be available on the bubble in a few weeks so that helps.  Who knows whats happening with Couch.

But I do have concerns about having both Smedts & Dickson in the forward line.  Sherman will come back in the team soon.

IMO, its Milera's spot in the team to lose.  All in his hands now.

GoldDigger

2184 - looking for a move on Ledger in the next 2 weeks.

charliesheen

#18
Decent score.

No Fyfe, No Pendlebury, No Lake, & Kept Broughton.  Team is looking good.

Would be tempted to move Yaz > Duffield, but thats just me.  Has a very good role and was subbed out game 2 due to heavy knock.

I think you can afford to trade under-performing premiums given your team situation.

charliesheen

Quote from: GoldDigger on April 14, 2012, 01:32:25 PM
You're right, charlie. I'm worried about Milera's JS - liked Stanley better, but not enough $$$.

Saints form has to be a bit of a question atm, given who they've played so far.

Gawd wish I took your advice :)  Had the cash too.

GoldDigger

Quote from: charliesheen on April 16, 2012, 04:22:31 PM
Quote from: GoldDigger on April 14, 2012, 01:32:25 PM
You're right, charlie. I'm worried about Milera's JS - liked Stanley better, but not enough $$$.

Saints form has to be a bit of a question atm, given who they've played so far.

Gawd wish I took your advice :)  Had the cash too.

Haha, thanks charlie!

It's true Yaz hasn't kept his initial form, in a team that is performing so well!

I'll be relying on a bench rookie to replace Goodes this week, else some covering trade (Hall?)

My other thought is Coniglio --> Clarke (moving Lids to mids), or even Coniglio --> forward (moving Lids to mids and Smedts to backs - assuming that's possible).

charliesheen

Clarke needs to average about 80-85 at his current price to justify the trade.  If your having issues with rookies not playing, bring Treloar early in the forward line.  Its a risk, but in your circumstance I would consider it.

Yaz has been very underwhelming.  I would strongly consider a Malceski/Duffield sideways trade if I were you.  You could also consider waiting another week and paying a bit more, if that means making a better decision.

With all the best defenders in round 13, your really limiting your options.


GoldDigger

Shaw --> Clarke, Ledger --> Treloar gets me around the Goodes and Shaw problems, removes Ledger and picks up Clarke, who could go well in the next couple weeks with heater and Daisy out.

charliesheen

Quote from: GoldDigger on April 19, 2012, 10:05:12 PM
Shaw --> Clarke, Ledger --> Treloar gets me around the Goodes and Shaw problems, removes Ledger and picks up Clarke, who could go well in the next couple weeks with heater and Daisy out.

IMO, take Birchall/Carrots.  I consider both heavily underpriced for what they will average in the future.  Both potential top 7 backs this year.  Treloar option is a good one.

GoldDigger

OUT   Mumford ($610,300)    IN   Naitanui ($513,800)
OUT   Shaw ($516,300)    IN   Stanley ($247,300)

Brendon Goddard, Brett Deledio,Tomas Bugg, Tim Mohr , Greg Broughton, Chris Yarran, Steven Morris
Brandon Ellis, Billie Smedts

Gary Ablett jnr, Andrew Swallow, Joel Selwood, Stephen Coniglio, James Magner, James McDonald
Dylan Shiel, Tom Ledger

Nic Naitanui, Jonathan Giles
Jarrad Redden, Orren Stephenson

Lance Franklin,Steve Johnson, Matthew Pavlich, Dustin Martin, Devon Smith, Rhys Stanley, Adam Kennedy
Adam Goodes, Tory Dickson

Jay

Howdy GD ;)

Interesting trades mate! Natanui is a good unique 100ppg player..i went for sandi myself
Not sure about shaw-->stanley probly missed the stanley boat, last week was the week to go! Not worth the risk at 240k imo but good luck :)

Your team looks ok this round with only 1 benched premium!

charliesheen

I agree, Stanley was strange decision.  M.Clarke has much more upside, wish you had stuck to your original plan.

GoldDigger

Could not take Clarke and save Goodes's donut. Had to move Smedts to the back, and grab a forward. Coulda been Treloar, but I'm happy to take him for Ledger next week.

charliesheen

#28
Ahh fair enough.  Still would have taken Treloar, was locked for me most of preseason.  Sometimes you need to back your preseason research, and pull the trigger early.

At 240k, Stanley needs to push an ~85 SC average to justify the price, maybe I just don't rate him.

GoldDigger

Quote from: charliesheen on April 22, 2012, 03:28:58 PM
... maybe I just don't rate him.

There's a lot who do ... I'm hoping they're right!