Shaw vs. Adcock (No poll because I want reasons)

Started by LaHug, March 30, 2012, 08:42:21 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

LaHug

March 30, 2012, 08:42:21 PM
Shaw is Shaw, one of the top scoring backs but not too smart.
Adcock is named at centre and showed last year that he can score big but can also do nothing...
Thoughts?

jfitty

#1
March 30, 2012, 08:43:13 PM
Shaw - bring Adcock in later once you know his role and is injury free

Windigo

#2
March 30, 2012, 08:43:47 PM
Adcock is too iffy, can turn it on. But better options like Heppell IMO.

Shaw.

Nails

#3
March 30, 2012, 08:43:57 PM
Shaw is a shaw thing. You can't say that with Adcock.

But easily Shaw, Shaw is a guaranteed thing. Adcock is pretty good WHEN playing in the midfield, but Brisbane have one of the most injury prone backlines. The second we sustain 1-2 injuries to our backs it's Adcock who fills the void. Once he goes back there his scores will drop off.

Better the devil you know than the one you don't.

sledgey7

#4
March 30, 2012, 08:44:05 PM
adcock coz shaw is a knob

sledgey7

#6
March 30, 2012, 08:45:26 PM
haha. clearly shaw is the choice.

LaHug

#7
March 30, 2012, 08:46:28 PM
Shaw it is. May this season be kind to everyone!
GOOD LUCK!

(Hopefully I can do better than the last two games....)

LaHug

#8
March 31, 2012, 03:32:29 PM
I regret my decision...

stew42

#9
March 31, 2012, 03:34:09 PM
don't feel too bad, he did receive a friggin fwd tag, wait until he is free and scores 130

LaHug

#10
March 31, 2012, 03:39:59 PM
Quote from: stew42 on March 31, 2012, 03:34:09 PM
don't feel too bad, he did receive a friggin fwd tag, wait until he is free and scores 130
Yeah, I know I shouldn't be knee jerking but this is my DT season so far...
Shiel, Cameron, Ellis, Morris, Shaw all on the field
Bugg, Magner on the bench
Sigh
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions