Jed Adcock - Finally Fully Fit?

Started by TMurphBROWNLOW, March 30, 2012, 12:49:02 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

TMurphBROWNLOW

I have a gut feeling that he's going to be a super player this year! I've had this every year but I'm thinking this is it! no more bullshiz! no more injuries! average of 85-95! am I getting too ahead of myself?

the alternative is mitchell Golby, who I've had in since game 2 NAB then recently traded out for his Brisbane teammate. started to get cold feet but they're starting to warm up again! I want him back but I want to keep Adcock! what can I do?

DEFENCE: Goddard, Shaw, Deledio, Adcock, Broughton, Hargrave, Bugg (Ellis, Morris)

could I do the unspeakable and drop Shaw?

picker_man

im tossing up between either hanley or adcock either one will be in my team and i think they can both ave 85+ and both will be unique, but going with hanley as he's cheaper and doesnt have the injury issues
i wouldnt drop shaw to get in golby as the lions have a few running hb players and  i think golby mite get a different role to what weve soon so far

Lions01

Theres a few reason why i would love to have Adcock in my side.

He started last year very well and dropped off when he was required to do more of a lock down job and give some experience and leadership in the backline (due to the injuries of Merrett, forcing Patful to play on the 2nd tall leaving adcock on the dangerous small, also the move of Mcgrath to the forward line)

Brisbane's got a few players that can play the Half Back role which hopefully frees Adcock to play in the middle more. Players like Hanley, Golby, Patful, Lester and even Docherty when fit could fill these roles.


With Golby his Nab 2 score of 100 was without Hanley playing, Nab 4 score of 94 was without Mcgrath playing so might lose some points there. I'm personally tossing up between him and Lake really unsure of what ill do yet

TMurphBROWNLOW

Quote from: picker_man on March 30, 2012, 01:17:12 PM
im tossing up between either hanley or adcock either one will be in my team and i think they can both ave 85+ and both will be unique, but going with hanley as he's cheaper and doesnt have the injury issues
i wouldnt drop shaw to get in golby as the lions have a few running hb players and  i think golby mite get a different role to what weve soon so far

haha yeah I had a little nap and woke up saying "what was I thinking?" hahaha I would never take out shaw for golby!

& Lions you bring up some really good points there! I am interested to see how Golby goes with the full side back! I still think he'd average around 70~ at worst!