Take the risk??

[elephants]

Had Murphy as VC. Should I take his 120 as my captai score or look to Gazza Ablett for more?

[egosbar]

what risk , there is no loophole

am i missing something

[BGK]

what risk , there is no loophole

Hahaha their certainly is a loop hole.

I'd probably back Gazza in mate.

[Zombie2.5]

Gazza! safe side is 120 but i reckon 130ish for Gazza.
is tempting though

[elephants]

It's tough but yeah I am leaning toward the Gazz option...Why couldn't you score 20 more or 20 less Marc!?!?!?!

[Jukes]

Gazza will hopefully score over 150 get him captain.

[Scrads]

If it didnt mean choosing someone who isnt playing this week I would have said take it but considering you have to, then go with Gaz.

[elephants]

Got N. Bock in to get Buggs score as well...

[Colliwobblers]

Gazza will do at least that well v Crows, as promising as they are so were Richmond, Suns might not win but Gaj will have a blinder

[Scrads]

Got N. Bock in to get Buggs score as well...

If you really want Bock in your team, then take Murphy's 120.

There is nothing like runs on the board- they cant be lost.

[elephants]

Okay thanks guys. I'll make another thread to sort out my backline :P

[Holz]

deinately take the 120, GAZ should beat it but 120 is definately good enough to keep, its higher than abletts average.

[Ziplock]

abletts last 5 v the crows averages 125.

ablett.

[elephants]

Errrrggg so torn :P

[Adamant]

I would make Gazza Captain as I think he will get at least 125 BUT I have learned from the Loophole to not be greedy. Last year I had Cox as Loophole VC and from memory he scored about 125, I didnt think it was enogh and made Swanny captain and he ened up getting about 100-105. I lost around 50 points from that decision and it cost me the game  :-\