Will Dangerfield BURN us Again?

[Virgil]

Gray and Danger will both burn everyone who picks them.  I recommend all of you jump off while you can   ;D.

[essendon2]

Gray and Danger will both burn everyone who picks them.  I recommend all of you jump off while you can   ;D.

;)


Watson + Gibbs + gray 
or 
Thompson + Gibbs + Dangerfield
???? :o

[Football Factory]

I like option 2

[elephants]

Yes he will burn. Everyone get off him.

[mpollock]

Can't be bothered looking up the prices ... but out of Danger, Grey and Sidebum ...

Sidebum will be the most consistent easily
Grey will have the highest ceiling ...

But i think Danger may average the most.
I can see danger scoring some massive scores and some crap ... he will average more then sidebottom due to this and more then grey coz he will injure himself or have a massive form drop as with previous years ...

But lets face it ... these guys are priced like they are because they are a RISK ... not many risks come off ...
i have danger ... but only because i couldn't afford anyone else and i was happy with the rest of my team

[ShaynoB]

First year he has been garanteed a Midfield role  ;)

No such thing as a 'garantee' in footy ;) haha

Dangerfield is still on my black list along with Shaw! And a couple of others I can't think of atm

[picker_man]

Can't be bothered looking up the prices ... but out of Danger, Grey and Sidebum ...

Sidebum will be the most consistent easily
Grey will have the highest ceiling ...

But i think Danger may average the most.
I can see danger scoring some massive scores and some crap ... he will average more then sidebottom due to this and more then grey coz he will injure himself or have a massive form drop as with previous years ...

But lets face it ... these guys are priced like they are because they are a RISK ... not many risks come off ...
i have danger ... but only because i couldn't afford anyone else and i was happy with the rest of my team

im hoping im not the only one i could say the price of every player whilst having a ciesta...

[Tom_16]

No way I'd have Danger. Every year there is all this talk.....Nothing happens.

Couldn't agree more windigo, got no doubt he will increase his avg but it won't be enough. If you pick him you'd have to be expecting an avg of 90+ which is hard to see happening.

[Phasir]

I'm going with Dangermouse for the third "breakout" year, he's bound to deliver soon, he's going to be playing midfield this year with Adelaide looking like a hungry, physical team you'd have to back him in for consistent scores of 80-90 along with some freak scores of 140 when he wracks up 35d, 10m, 4g against GC & GWS 8)

[Holz]

No way I'd have Danger. Every year there is all this talk.....Nothing happens.

Couldn't agree more windigo, got no doubt he will increase his avg but it won't be enough. If you pick him you'd have to be expecting an avg of 90+ which is hard to see happening.

He doesnt need to average 90+ to justify picking him, he is only priced at a 70 average and with the lack of round 11 forwards, i would happily take anything around 85.  Evne low 80s are ok, i would want more but i would be happy taking it as my 7th forward.

[Phasir]

agreed, he's one of the few round 11 forwards, he's DPP, in ripping NAB form, in the leadership group so won't be dropped to the SANFL, he's moving into a more permanent midfield role so not as many 60's from no delivery into the forward 50, there's a couple more players at the club who'll get a tag before him.. I'd be very surprised if he averaged less than 80 which is pretty serviceable from a forward that fits the structure forced onto us by the AFL's byes. :)

[coolfugitiv0]

Gray and Danger will both burn everyone who picks them.  I recommend all of you jump off while you can   ;D.

;)


Watson + Gibbs + gray
or
Thompson + Gibbs + Dangerfield
???? :o

So basically Watson/Gray vs Thompson/Dangerfield?  :P
Is Watson/Danger an option at all?

[Phasir]

Gray and Danger will both burn everyone who picks them.  I recommend all of you jump off while you can   ;D.

;)


Watson + Gibbs + gray
or
Thompson + Gibbs + Dangerfield
???? :o

So basically Watson/Gray vs Thompson/Dangerfield?  :P
Is Watson/Danger an option at all?

+1 I'd prefer Watson/Dangerfield out of that, and you get left with some cash in the kitty :)