Will Dangerfield BURN us Again?

essendon2 · March 28, 2012, 12:24:46 PM

Dangerfield only averaged 71 last year and is priced at 349k, Adelaide have a very enticing draw and play GWS and GCS twice, however, Danger did only score 1 x 100 last year and that came against Gold Coast where he scored 128.
What will he average?

Currently got him at F5, but would it be wiser, or a better option to drop Gibbs to Watson/Cotchin, then upgrade Danger to Gray?

MID: Pendlebury, Boyd, Ablett, Thompson, Gibbs, McDonald
FWD: Franklin, Fyfe, Robinson, Sidebottom, Dangerfield, Kennedy, D.Smith

Stocutz · March 28, 2012, 12:28:41 PM

i like gibbs to watson to get gray.

but i dont think danger will burn. ave 85+

essendon2 · March 28, 2012, 12:30:47 PM

what do reckon Gray will average?

Alka · March 28, 2012, 12:38:33 PM

Gray is just as likely to be underwhelming.

I think Danger has a better potential upside given his draw. I also like your addition of Gibbs, great scorer, great POD, I don't like the two other options you've mentioned nearly as much.

I can't imagine your back-line is very strong with 5 premo mids though? I strongly think 5 premo mids is too many to start with.

Justin Bieber · March 28, 2012, 12:41:48 PM

Gray to average 120 so love him in ;D

essendon2 · March 28, 2012, 12:44:47 PM

Quote from: Alka on March 28, 2012, 12:38:33 PM
Gray is just as likely to be underwhelming.

I think Danger has a better potential upside given his draw. I also like your addition of Gibbs, great scorer, great POD, I don't like the two other options you've mentioned nearly as much.

I can't imagine your back-line is very strong with 5 premo mids though? I strongly think 5 premo mids is too many to start with.

yeah, i'm definitely going 5 premo MIDS
~ backline had 3 Premiums, 1 mid price, 3 rooks

Gray has more upside than Dangerfield, especially with his average of 99 in his last 9 games

Justin Bieber · March 28, 2012, 12:48:36 PM

God stop talking up gray. He's only in 4.2% of teams for a reason. If you want some help PM me.

lollipop man · March 28, 2012, 01:05:03 PM

Dangerfield is better and cheaper than Gray.

Justin Bieber · March 28, 2012, 01:06:59 PM

Quote from: lollipop man on March 28, 2012, 01:05:03 PM
Dangerfield is better and cheaper than Gray.

Yes this guy knows what he's talking about ;)

Jalapeno · March 28, 2012, 01:22:18 PM

I have a bad feeling about both these guys to be honest. Thou i have both in my team ;)

essendon2 · March 28, 2012, 03:05:11 PM

Quote from: Jalapeno on March 28, 2012, 01:22:18 PM
I have a bad feeling about both these guys to be honest. Thou i have both in my team ;)

I have a good feeling about Gray, but a bad feeling about Dangerfield - but I don't want to miss the rise if he gets it along with the 28% that have picked him

Holz · March 28, 2012, 04:45:33 PM

Quote from: Jalapeno on March 28, 2012, 01:22:18 PM
I have a bad feeling about both these guys to be honest. Thou i have both in my team ;)

i agree i know they are likely going to burn me bad, but i still have them.

yorgis · March 28, 2012, 04:49:23 PM

both will worry the hell out of you every week and i think gibbs is a great adition. only thing that worries me about him is

the tagging role that rats often wants him to play

Windigo · March 28, 2012, 05:01:05 PM

No way I'd have Danger. Every year there is all this talk.....Nothing happens.

essendon2 · March 28, 2012, 05:03:35 PM

Quote from: Windigo on March 28, 2012, 05:01:05 PM
No way I'd have Danger. Every year there is all this talk.....Nothing happens.

first time he's shown consistent solid NAB cup dt scores though .