Grimes or Conca or someone else?

[ubeaut]

 Am Looking for a mid priced back. Got Lake. Not sold on Waters. Grimes apparently played VFL and left the field at half time with 4 disposals. Was keen to keep him as a POD but the lack of match practice is a worry. People were all over Conca  but  not so much now. Yes he will play mids and won't be the sub/subbed like last season. But he also goes into a midfield of Foley,Tuck,Deledio,Cotchin,Jackson and Martin. What do you guys think?Dempsey's is a possibility? Thoughts appreciated. Thanx.

[Footyrulz]

would not get any more than 2 bargains but if u are:

i would have got malceski, but hes played so probably hargrave or dempsey.

grimes too risky IMO and not sold on conca.

[Colliwobblers]

malceski played already...

1. Conca - GUN
2. Hargrave - cheap NAB form
3. Golby - dearer but NAB form
4. Howard - will be a GUN question marks on JS ? cheapest also...

[meow meow]

Dempsey has had a really good preseason.

[ubeaut]

I should also mention I have Malceski. I know three midpricers is risky but it allows me to have more mids who are in the fwds(Fyfe etc) As well as a Danger/Nroo type. I Find it really hard picking third prem back. The byes put me of Newman,Fisher and Scotland,Yarran. Bock is suspended. Enright is underdone. Can we trust Shaw? Broughton's role is unknown but it seems Ballantyne,,Mzungu,Fyfe,Mundy,Barlow,Hill will be the main 6 mids.