wtf is mumford doing...

Started by essendon2, March 24, 2012, 09:20:50 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

MLS

Quote from: Sleeken on March 24, 2012, 10:18:27 PM
I started shiel too, not the wisest choice. Mummy doesn't seem to be putting in much of an effort.

Niether is Goodes

Macca#23

Well I'm never making Goodes my captain ever again. He's done absolutely nothing. Looks disinterested and isn't playing like his usual self. Really annoyed now I didn't do the captain loophole.

Sleeken

Quote from: Macca#23 on March 24, 2012, 10:27:22 PM
Well I'm never making Goodes my captain ever again. He's done absolutely nothing. Looks disinterested and isn't playing like his usual self. Really annoyed now I didn't do the captain loophole.

Ouch.

On a positive, McDonald is going well.

jabroni

giles is now outscoring mumford *facepalm*

Windigo

Mumford, that was laziest 90 odd I have ever seen.

Holz

Quote from: Windigo on March 24, 2012, 11:18:56 PM
Mumford, that was laziest 90 odd I have ever seen.

yeah i was happy with him, he looked shocking and still basically got his average, wait till he lifts.

Chelskiman

Quote from: Windigo on March 24, 2012, 11:18:56 PM
Mumford, that was laziest 90 odd I have ever seen.

Lol, I know.  How he ended up with 91 I'll never know.  Will certainly take it though, considering how awful he was. xD

stew42

And he had 3 FA's, so technically, he tonned up  :D

maccar86

you're all fkn duds. mumford scored 91 pts in his first hit out. the swans smashed them and stoppages were minimal.

i love how people whinge and moan after one game, which turned out to be fine.


Holz

Quote from: maccar86 on March 25, 2012, 06:35:31 AM
you're all fkn duds. mumford scored 91 pts in his first hit out. the swans smashed them and stoppages were minimal.

i love how people whinge and moan after one game, which turned out to be fine.

did you watch the game, people arent unhappy with his Dt score, he looked really lazy out there today. Im sure it was a one off but if he plays like that next week he isnt going to get close to 90. He was lucky he got gifted that goal, i would have been very unhappy with a sub 80 score against GWS.

Like i said probably just a slow start, but if he is like that next game im not going to be happy.

essendon2

#25
Quote from: Holzman on March 25, 2012, 06:42:27 AM
Quote from: maccar86 on March 25, 2012, 06:35:31 AM
you're all fkn duds. mumford scored 91 pts in his first hit out. the swans smashed them and stoppages were minimal.

i love how people whinge and moan after one game, which turned out to be fine.

did you watch the game, people arent unhappy with his Dt score, he looked really lazy out there today. Im sure it was a one off but if he plays like that next week he isnt going to get close to 90. He was lucky he got gifted that goal, i would have been very unhappy with a sub 80 score against GWS.

Like i said probably just a slow start, but if he is like that next game im not going to be happy.
+1
hopefully Cox gets like 50   :P

TheMailman

I'm assuming that none of you actually went to the game, seeing as you're calling Goodes and Mumford lazy.

Mumford had to work solo against 3 different ruckmen.

Calling Goodes lazy is just dumb and you should look at yourself hard. He made hard leads up the ground . Put forward pressure on and went for marks.

Just because he didn't score you the points you wanted, does that make them lazy.

You should call them up to make them apologise ffs.

upthemaidens

Quote from: essendon2 on March 25, 2012, 08:08:20 AM
Quote from: Holzman on March 25, 2012, 06:42:27 AM
Quote from: maccar86 on March 25, 2012, 06:35:31 AM
you're all fkn duds. mumford scored 91 pts in his first hit out. the swans smashed them and stoppages were minimal.

i love how people whinge and moan after one game, which turned out to be fine.

did you watch the game, people arent unhappy with his Dt score, he looked really lazy out there today. Im sure it was a one off but if he plays like that next week he isnt going to get close to 90. He was lucky he got gifted that goal, i would have been very unhappy with a sub 80 score against GWS.

Like i said probably just a slow start, but if he is like that next game im not going to be happy.
+1
hopefully Cox gets like 50   :P
yeah hope so..  but 50 is asking for alot :)  i'll be happy with under 110

Chopps

Quote from: TheMailman on March 25, 2012, 11:13:56 AM
I'm assuming that none of you actually went to the game, seeing as you're calling Goodes and Mumford lazy.

Mumford had to work solo against 3 different ruckmen.

Calling Goodes lazy is just dumb and you should look at yourself hard. He made hard leads up the ground . Put forward pressure on and went for marks.

Just because he didn't score you the points you wanted, does that make them lazy.

You should call them up to make them apologise ffs.

spot on, watching the game i thought goodes & mumford played well.

Jackina

Quote from: TheMailman on March 25, 2012, 11:13:56 AM
I'm assuming that none of you actually went to the game, seeing as you're calling Goodes and Mumford lazy.

Mumford had to work solo against 3 different ruckmen.

Calling Goodes lazy is just dumb and you should look at yourself hard. He made hard leads up the ground . Put forward pressure on and went for marks.

Just because he didn't score you the points you wanted, does that make them lazy.

You should call them up to make them apologise ffs.

Good call. Two top class players that get disrespect cause of their DT output. It's sad, immature.