Is Coniglio worth the extra cash?

[jamesalex]

Hi,

I'm strongly considering getting Coniglio into my midfield, but is he really worth the extra 70-80k over other midfield rookies? This 4 prem mid team has the following:

Shiel
McDonald
Magner
Kerridge (or Kennedy, D. Smith, Zorko)

For the scoring potential, is that 70-80k really worth it for a 4 prem midfield? I don't think so.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On the flipside, would a 3 prem midfield team need Coniglio? The rookies would be:

Shiel
McDonald
Magner
Kerridge (or Kennedy, D. Smith, Zorko)
...Ledger/Clay Smith/A.Miles.

Obviously Shiel, Mcdonald and Magner would be the 3 starters each week, but that leaves your bench very thin. Is Coniglio needed in this situation?

Cheers.

[cortez]

ive got him. just makes my mids looks a bit more reliable with him sitting at m4. starting with coniglio, shiel and magner with macdonald and ledger on my bench.

[thebrock]

I currently have him at MID 5. I am also wondering if the cash is worth it?

[spasticnut]

GET CONIGLIO IN HE IS A GUN! he is definately worth th emoney he wasnt gws's first midfield pick for nothing

[meow meow]

GET CONIGLIO IN HE IS A GUN! he is definately worth th emoney he wasnt gws's first midfield pick for nothing

Tim Golds was their first pick if you want to get technical.

[PICCOLLO]

Normally id say no but 3 premium midfields kinda need him.  Esp. Given mac, shiel et al will be rested here and there.  If only there were more solid rookie mid options at other teams....could use that extra 70 k.