The last minute make or break move

Holz · March 23, 2012, 05:10:32 PM

I have been a fan of malceski since 2010 when he killed it for me, he looks great in the nab and is named on the wing round 1 and i have been messing around with my team for a while and i think i have it down to 2 combinations in my backline.

option 1: Goddard, Shaw, Lids, Waters, Hargreave, Clarke, Ellis (Bugg, Morris/Spurr)

Option 2: Goddard, Lids, Broughton, Waters, Malceski, Ellis than one of the follwing 3 on the field Bugg, Morris, Spurr

i have tried to squeeze money out of my other lines but that stuffs up my structrue, the only thing i can do is in option 2 go swan to pendles than spurr to clarke, but im not sure

The F.A.R.K. · March 23, 2012, 05:12:42 PM

Goddard, Shaw, Lids, Broughton, Mohr, Ellis, Bugg
Shaw, Brennan/Morris

that should work for you mate

Holz · March 23, 2012, 05:16:42 PM

Quote from: The F.A.R.K. on March 23, 2012, 05:12:42 PM
Goddard, Shaw, Lids, Broughton, Mohr, Ellis, Bugg
Shaw, Brennan/Morris

that should work for you mate

it does work out but im really looking for option 1 and 2, i see the value in the likes of hargreave, malceski, waters etc...

Mr.Craig · March 23, 2012, 05:20:56 PM

Pretty lineball between those two options. Depends on if you think Hargarve's return is the real deal or not. Malceski may turn out to be a safer pick. Probably a good POD as well.

Option 2.

Holz · March 23, 2012, 05:40:32 PM

suprised by the poll, i thought i was going to get alot of flack for picking eski. The only thing annoying me about option 2 is no clarke and there is that little thought in the back of my mind that going broughton over shaw could be a huge mistake.

But hte only way i can fix one of those is swan to pendles or boyd to gibbs.

Colliwobblers · March 23, 2012, 05:49:59 PM

is waters really that good? he is the dearest I'd consider eski and hargrave together ? for me hargrave is a lock unless howard is named on the field round 1, then i have to make that decision, and its between eski and conca for that other spot where you have waters.

If waters is that good, i think eski can outscore hargrave as he is in a DT friendlier role, but the dogs will get a lot of ball in defence and seem determind to use it like the hawks this season...

Holz · March 23, 2012, 05:54:17 PM

Quote from: Colliwobblers on March 23, 2012, 05:49:59 PM
is waters really that good? he is the dearest I'd consider eski and hargrave together ? for me hargrave is a lock unless howard is named on the field round 1, then i have to make that decision, and its between eski and conca for that other spot where you have waters.

If waters is that good, i think eski can outscore hargrave as he is in a DT friendlier role, but the dogs will get a lot of ball in defence and seem determind to use it like the hawks this season...

would you go option 1 with eski instead of waters over option 2?

TheHanger · March 23, 2012, 07:00:48 PM

what is POD?

FlipFlops · March 23, 2012, 07:02:16 PM

Point Of Difference? :-\

sledgey7 · March 23, 2012, 07:13:36 PM

drop swan. a lot of us have done it already. my team looks better with boyd in his place i think.

Holz · March 23, 2012, 07:14:51 PM

Quote from: sledgey7 on March 23, 2012, 07:13:36 PM
drop swan. a lot of us have done it already. my team looks better with boyd in his place i think.

i have boyd, im just not sure if clarke over spurr or shaw over broughton is wroth dropping swanny down to pendles

Memphistopheles · March 23, 2012, 07:18:13 PM

Quote from: Holzman on March 23, 2012, 05:54:17 PM
Quote from: Colliwobblers on March 23, 2012, 05:49:59 PM
is waters really that good? he is the dearest I'd consider eski and hargrave together ? for me hargrave is a lock unless howard is named on the field round 1, then i have to make that decision, and its between eski and conca for that other spot where you have waters.

If waters is that good, i think eski can outscore hargrave as he is in a DT friendlier role, but the dogs will get a lot of ball in defence and seem determind to use it like the hawks this season...

would you go option 1 with eski instead of waters over option 2?

I would if that was my choices.

However, I am not going to pick Eski so won't be doing that.

Colliwobblers · March 23, 2012, 07:25:06 PM

Quote from: Holzman on March 23, 2012, 05:54:17 PM
Quote from: Colliwobblers on March 23, 2012, 05:49:59 PM
is waters really that good? he is the dearest I'd consider eski and hargrave together ? for me hargrave is a lock unless howard is named on the field round 1, then i have to make that decision, and its between eski and conca for that other spot where you have waters.

If waters is that good, i think eski can outscore hargrave as he is in a DT friendlier role, but the dogs will get a lot of ball in defence and seem determind to use it like the hawks this season...

would you go option 1 with eski instead of waters over option 2?

YES

TheHanger · March 23, 2012, 07:30:07 PM

Haha, the poll looks like it should help you

Zombie2.5 · March 23, 2012, 07:51:48 PM

Avoid china knees!! I like the look of him but ive got a feeling hes gona get injured again.
Option one for safety BUT if you want a little more risk and uniqueyness go option 2.

I reckon option 1 but Good Luck if you go with 2