K.HUNT SERIOUSLY??

[Scrads]

Not gonna lie, he is actually semi-tempting with the lack of reliable back rookies.

[mezzoculo]

Not nearly as silly as it sounds.  Has good job security and will be playing in the midfield.  He scored around 40 points in the first half against Sydney last week.  Not too shabby for a guy priced under 150k.

Yes, but he finished the game with 50-odd from 73% TOG.

[Justin Bieber]

He's a gun Mezza, lock.

[Virgil]

Not nearly as silly as it sounds.  Has good job security and will be playing in the midfield.  He scored around 40 points in the first half against Sydney last week.  Not too shabby for a guy priced under 150k.

Yes, but he finished the game with 50-odd from 73% TOG.

Consistency definitely won't be his strong suit. 

[TheHanger]

I think the experts are saying he will be a great player... when compared to K Hunt from 2011.

As a rugby great, the guy's over-riding instinct appears to be to use his hands. He just does not kick, so you are relying upon him tackling everything without an orange top whenever he is on the field. Not sure that's going to happen often enough to justify selection at $150k.

rugby great?!?!?! I doubt he was even that

come on mate, do some research first! what ridiculous standards do you have?

[egosbar]

i cant believe im seriously considering him , but the mid time expected has me questioning marty clark to k hunt

it could be a unique enough move if clark spuds it up , my thoughts are hunt should get a lot of tackles in the midfield along with a bit of ball , marty clark will probably get enough early games but will he play 22 mmmm hunt should if fit

i think they may score relatively the same

any thoughts am i mad here or not , im not panicking and making late changes but i have been tossing up having him in but i cant afford two players at that risky price range