Club representation, and player choice

[Crows84]

Just had a look through my current side and the only teams i have no players from are St Kilda and Geelong but both could be represented by switching gws players. Made me wonder what kind of spread others have and if people are deliberatly picking players (all prems, mids and rookies) from clubs that were successful last year or are expected to improve on their season this year or are trying to get a good spread?

[shaker]

I,m finding  that the teams with round 11 byes are having trouble making it into my squad,the gws rookie factor.Trying to keep it to 8-10 round 11 bye players which does not leave a much room for round 11 prems.

[elephants]

I have 4 adelaide players and only two Pies... :o

[4INAROW]

7 from gws and no more than two from any other club coincidentally.

[owenbond007]

I have only one pie. 1 bomber. I not a massive hawk fan but find i have 3. Got a pretty good spread not that that was what i was going for

[SydneyRox]

No Bulldogs, No N.melb, with 6 GWS.

[stew42]

No Lions, Blues, Dons, Roos or Eagles, with 6 Giants. And probably most crazily, 3 Suns? 2 PA players?

[Crows84]

well my structure has changed alot and now i have no players from NM, Stkilda, west coast or the bulldogs, and suppringsly collingwood

[Kuruki]

No SYD ADE PORT WC ESS

Wow i scare myself looking at that. No Adelaide and Eagles?? wtf am i doing

[Crows84]

interesting....


I now how at least one player from every club except Stkilda unless i swap Scotland to goddard.