Malceski or Waters?? Please help??

[mpollock]

Both injury prone ...

Maceski when he has played to full 22 games in a season (2 times out the last 4) he average 95 and just over 100.
He also scored 122 today (51,79,52 DT scores in the other NAB games.

Waters has to 90ish scored ... but has never averaged over low 80s in DT.

Is Lake, Hargrave, Howard, J.Grimes (round 1??) a better bet??

So stuck on this one??

[mcpies]

i have malceski and b smith atm....
am still unsure though...

[mpollock]

Tempted to go with neither but don't have the cash for a Birchell, Suckling etc
Also, the bye makes it difficult as all the best defenders are round 13!!

[devize]

malceski a proven supercoach premium went fit, waters hasn't ever averaged over 83 so go with malceski. he's killed it in the preseason so far and has a good early fixture, he'll be a quick cashcow for sure even if he gets injured.

[mpollock]

Found the cash for Heppell instead ... if he isn't looking like averaging 90 and Malceski or Waters kills it I will use a trade.

[jabroni]

yeah i dont think waters will kill SC but ill have 1 trade to downgrade heppel to eski if he starts killing it

[Footyrulz]

malceski. looked alright in pre season and capable of scoring much better than waters