team set!! any ideas to make it better? rate for a rate

[Squalidly Pristine]

hi guys,
sorry about last post that was my brothers team.
here is the real champion team!!

def: godds, scotland, birchall, malceski, lake, bugg, ellis (smedts, darley)

mid: ablett, murphy,boyd,selwood,stevens,mcdonald (kerridge, magner)

ruc: cox, giles (redden, orren)

for: buddy,fyfe,martin,sidebottom??,dangerfield,porps,smith (paine,hall)

thoughts? post link to your team and ill rate!!

thanks

[Dilen9]

hi guys,
sorry about last post that was my brothers team.
here is the real champion team!!

def: godds, scotland, birchall, malceski, lake, bugg, ellis (smedts, darley)

mid: ablett, murphy,boyd,selwood,stevens,mcdonald (kerridge, magner)

ruc: cox, giles (redden, orren)

for: buddy,fyfe,martin,sidebottom??,dangerfield,porps,smith (paine,hall)

thoughts? post link to your team and ill rate!!

thanks

Hey mate,thanks for rating my team, I will rate yours

DEF:  It is pretty good, but I am not too sure on birchall. For some reason I think he will find it hard to have a breakthrough season, I like the idea that you have saved money for the other positions.
MID:  Great idea that you have got selwood and Boyd instead of ablett or swan. I dunno about Murphy though, he will get a tag all year, and from the nab cup, I don't think he will do too well trying to break it. McDonald  probably won't play all the games, personally I would get Miles or Kennedy.
RCK:  Can't fault that.
FWD: you have to much mid pricers. You have to replace either side bottom, Martin, or Dangerfield with soeone like mathew pavlich, or Stevey J, nice choice of rookies. I don't think that props will get that much more than a cheap rookie, so maybe that's an idea, other than that it's alright.

OVERALL: A good team, but would be a great team with a few tweaks. 7/10 - GOOD

[tor01doc]

With all due respect to you Dilen9 - what a strange 'rate'.

Birchall was 5th highest total point scoring defender last year. You can't breakthrough any more than that. If he maintains that you'll be laughing. He's a ripper.

Malceski and Lake are risks but both could work. If one does it'll be worth it.

Maybe one really solid down, but risks may be worth it.

4 gun mids mean 1 gun ruck. Both seem popular strategies. I'm leaning to 3 mids to get more money from rookies there.

Murphy has been tagged all his career. 3rd highest mid scorer last year. Dilen9!! You paying attention?

Good luck