Poll - (mid)Watson & (def) Rookie or (def) Goddard & (mid) Rookie.

Started by Dorge, March 16, 2012, 11:30:08 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

(mid)Watson & (def)Rookie or (def)Goddard & (mid)Rookie?

(mid)Watson & (def)Rookie
6 (37.5%)
(def)Goddard & (mid)Rookie
10 (62.5%)

Total Members Voted: 2

Voting closed: March 24, 2012, 11:30:08 AM

Dorge

Undecided on weather or not to risk Goddard on his preseason form, and if better options are found in the midfield at the same price tag.

kilbluff1985

need more info like current mids and current defs cant make a choice until then

wooda02

Ignore Goddards NAB cup form, he is a proven premium who will carve up once season proper starts. Also more choice for quality rookie mids I believe.

Disco

QuoteAlso more choice for quality rookie mids I believe.
+1

Dorge

Quote from: kilbluff1995 on March 16, 2012, 11:35:18 AM
need more info like current mids and current defs cant make a choice until then

Done, current team is.

DEF
scotland, shaw, duff, lake, hargrave, ellis B, Darley - Smedts Boumann

MID
Ablett, Selwood, Watson, Wingard, Smith D, Clifton - Hampton, Gibson

RUC
Mummy, Kreuzer (think COX will drop if he's not in Ruck reaping hitouts) - Giles, Redden

FOR
Franklin, Fyfe, Pav, Martin, Rievoldt, Dangerfield, Porp - Pfeiffer, Couch.

Its a stacked forward, but it just looks kinda right to me. I just hate seeing two rooks in defense, and the risk in duff, lake & hargrave. Could fall to pieces easily, or if it pays off see a giant leap in ranking.

kilbluff1985

With that midfield has to Watson or it will be way to weak defense looks strong enough