Luey vc Mcevoy

[Tom_16]

Pretty straight forward, who and why? thanks

[Tom_16]

*Vs

[Jukes]

Mummy over the both of them

[Tom_16]

Mummy over the both of them

Considering mummy but he is a bit inconsistant and hasn't played more than 20 games in a season

[Colliwobblers]

i went mcevoy, i had been on mummy and i had been on jacobs, and for that reason i am starting cox and giles rather than upgrade to cox and guess which other premo to start i'm going to start cox and upgrade to the best "other" premo ahead of the byes hopefuly.

and yes Cox is worth every extra cent just like swan is over any other midfielder 10-15 points below his 2011 average...

[Tom_16]

i went mcevoy, i had been on mummy and i had been on jacobs, and for that reason i am starting cox and giles rather than upgrade to cox and guess which other premo to start i'm going to start cox and upgrade to the best "other" premo ahead of the byes hopefuly.

and yes Cox is worth every extra cent just like swan is over any other midfielder 10-15 points below his 2011 average...

Cheers CW, idealy i'd start with cox as he will no doubt be the no.1 ruck but i simply can't arrofd him and i'm not willing to make sacrifices elsewhere to get him in. I'm currently leaning towards Mcevoy as luey has hudson and longer that may pinch points from him.

[elephants]

McEvoy.
- Only out and out ruckmen at the saints
- Has shown his great ceiling
- Is coming of age
- Seems a good bloke :P
- Doesn't have any major injury worries or suspension carry over points/reputation to worry about.

Get on. I have Cox/Jacobs though :P
           

[Justin Bieber]

McEvoy.
- Only out and out ruckmen at the saints
- Has shown his great ceiling
- Is coming of age
- Seems a good bloke :P
- Doesn't have any major injury worries or suspension carry over points/reputation to worry about.

Get on. I have Cox/Jacobs though :P
           

Taking a rd 11 donut? Or no Giles?

[elephants]

McEvoy.
- Only out and out ruckmen at the saints
- Has shown his great ceiling
- Is coming of age
- Seems a good bloke :P
- Doesn't have any major injury worries or suspension carry over points/reputation to worry about.

Get on. I have Cox/Jacobs though :P
           

Taking a rd 11 donut? Or no Giles?

Sorry, Cox OR Jacobs + Giles (Redden, Orren)

[Justin Bieber]

McEvoy.
- Only out and out ruckmen at the saints
- Has shown his great ceiling
- Is coming of age
- Seems a good bloke :P
- Doesn't have any major injury worries or suspension carry over points/reputation to worry about.

Get on. I have Cox/Jacobs though :P
           

Taking a rd 11 donut? Or no Giles?

Sorry, Cox OR Jacobs + Giles (Redden, Orren)

Cox.

[elephants]

McEvoy.
- Only out and out ruckmen at the saints
- Has shown his great ceiling
- Is coming of age
- Seems a good bloke :P
- Doesn't have any major injury worries or suspension carry over points/reputation to worry about.

Get on. I have Cox/Jacobs though :P
           

Taking a rd 11 donut? Or no Giles?

Sorry, Cox OR Jacobs + Giles (Redden, Orren)

Cox.

Struth.

[Justin Bieber]

McEvoy.
- Only out and out ruckmen at the saints
- Has shown his great ceiling
- Is coming of age
- Seems a good bloke :P
- Doesn't have any major injury worries or suspension carry over points/reputation to worry about.

Get on. I have Cox/Jacobs though :P
           

Taking a rd 11 donut? Or no Giles?

Sorry, Cox OR Jacobs + Giles (Redden, Orren)

Cox.

Struth.

Don't pick sauce, he will turn into Daniel Merritt haha ;)

[elephants]

I'll quote you on that. I see a big year from him ;)

[Tom_16]

McEvoy.
- Only out and out ruckmen at the saints
- Has shown his great ceiling
- Is coming of age
- Seems a good bloke :P
- Doesn't have any major injury worries or suspension carry over points/reputation to worry about.

Get on. I have Cox/Jacobs though :P
           

Cheers ele appreciate it.

[mezzoculo]

McEvoy.
- Only out and out ruckmen at the saints
- Has shown his great ceiling
- Is coming of age
- Seems a good bloke :P
- Doesn't have any major injury worries or suspension carry over points/reputation to worry about.

Get on. I have Cox/Jacobs though :P
           

Taking a rd 11 donut? Or no Giles?

Sorry, Cox OR Jacobs + Giles (Redden, Orren)

Cox.

Struth.

Don't pick sauce, he will turn into Daniel Merritt haha ;)

Ha ha - good one whatlez.

I've only been posting here at FF for a couple of months now but I'm begining to see a pattern emerge...

Folks discuss a player / strategy and then BAM! whatlez drops an outrageous statements without qualification. Thread then usually derails.  :P

I should copy/paste them all and create a special "whatlez reptrospective" thread at the end of the season to see how accurate your proclamations are!, whatlez!! Maybe I could start a betting market to guess the percentage accuracy?  ;)