2012 Brownlow Prediction

[Usman]

Round 1

GWS v Syd
3 J.Kennedy 130 (won the medal so he will get the 3 its as simple as that, umpires wont go against it.)
2 Jack 136
1 Bird 129

Palmer 126 unlucky to miss out
A.Kennedy 108 next best of the lot

Rich v Carl
3 Murphy 127
2 Cotchin 125
1 Kruezer 115

Both Carrazo 118 and Simpson 115 very unlucky to miss out in good games for both players. Another dissapointing game for a Richmond member of 10 years 

Haw v Coll
3 Pendlebury
2 Mitchell
1 Franklin (all these guys had ripper games and i am willing to change the order of these votes if convinced. I watched the entire game and they all played very, very well.)

Melb v BL
3 Black 160
2 Rockliff 142
1 Adcock 138 (the umpires love Black, and so does my scoring system)

GC v Adel
3 Ablett 164
2 Thompson 152
1 Tippett 125

Geel v Fre
3 Kelly 134
2 Sandilands 120
1 Fyfe 109 (Hard game to allocate votes Selwood, Chapman and Bartel all unlucky but were are the freo players? Pav maybe with the 2 matchwinners late in the last quarter?)

Kang v Ess
3 Stanton 191
2 Ryder 124
1 Zaharakis 120 ( Swallow 116 super unlucky and i could be convinced easily)

WB v WCE
3 Kennedy 112 (should get 3 for the 7 goals, but he really did nothing else other than sit in the goalsquare and kick goals. Only 11 touches and no defensive pressure does not sit well with my scoring system.)
2 Priddis 143 (17 clearances is absolutely insane!!!! nearly gave him the 3 like the scoring system would suggest)
1 Rosa 138 young Scott Selwood unlucky

Port v StK
3 Hartlett 124 (Gave it to a Port player in an upset win)
2 Dal Santo 131
1 Goddard 119 (Ebert only 101 but could be convinced that he should poll)

Im no techno wiz, so dont know how to make this post a sticky within the thread. If anyone knows how let me know. Cheers.

[Ziplock]

eh, I think palmer will edge in for 1 before bird.

[TheMailman]

eh, I think palmer will edge in for 1 before bird.

at the other side of the bias spectrum I disagree :)

[Kellogscrunchynut]

Pendlebury.

[Usman]

Round 1

GWS v Syd
3 J.Kennedy 130 (won the medal so he will get the 3 its as simple as that, umpires wont go against it.)
2 Jack 136
1 Bird 129

Palmer 126 unlucky to miss out
A.Kennedy 108 next best of the lot

Rich v Carl
3 Murphy 127
2 Cotchin 125
1 Kruezer 115

Both Carrazo 118 and Simpson 115 very unlucky to miss out in good games for both players. Another dissapointing game for a Richmond member of 10 years 

Haw v Coll
3 Pendlebury
2 Mitchell
1 Franklin (all these guys had ripper games and i am willing to change the order of these votes if convinced. I watched the entire game and they all played very, very well.)

Melb v BL
3 Black 160
2 Rockliff 142
1 Adcock 138 (the umpires love Black, and so does my scoring system)

GC v Adel
3 Ablett 164
2 Thompson 152
1 Tippett 125

Geel v Fre
3 Kelly 134
2 Sandilands 120
1 Fyfe 109 (Hard game to allocate votes Selwood, Chapman and Bartel all unlucky but were are the freo players? Pav maybe with the 2 matchwinners late in the last quarter?)

Kang v Ess
3 Stanton 191
2 Ryder 124
1 Zaharakis 120 ( Swallow 116 super unlucky and i could be convinced easily)

WB v WCE
3 Kennedy 112 (should get 3 for the 7 goals, but he really did nothing else other than sit in the goalsquare and kick goals. Only 11 touches and no defensive pressure does not sit well with my scoring system.)
2 Priddis 143 (17 clearances is absolutely insane!!!! nearly gave him the 3 like the scoring system would suggest)
1 Rosa 138 young Scott Selwood unlucky

Port v StK
3 Hartlett 124 (Gave it to a Port player in an upset win)
2 Dal Santo 131
1 Goddard 119 (Ebert only 101 but could be convinced that he should poll)

Im no techno wiz, so dont know how to make this post a sticky within the thread. If anyone knows how let me know. Cheers.

[meow meow]

Palmer will get 2 votes.

Carrazzo will get 2

Buddy will get the 2

Hanley will get a vote

Fyfe will get 3

Haven't seen the NM game

Libba could get a vote

NDS was clearly best on

[Usman]

Palmer meh maybe wont change it.
Carrazo likewise
Hanley or adcock still think adcock but??
Buddy is a possibilty for 3 let alone 2 or one so imay change that.
fyfe was good could change few bad mistakes though.
libba will not poll
will probs change NDS

Thanks for the advice  :)

[madskill55]

Round 1
GWS v Syd
3 J.Kennedy
2 Bird
1 Jack

Rich v Carl
3 Murphy
2 Cotchin
1 Carrazo

Haw v Coll
3 Franklin
2 Pendlebury
1 Mitchell

Melb v BL
3 Black
2 Rockliff
1 Adcock

GC v Adel
3 Thompson
2 Ablett
1 Tippett

Geel v Fre
3 Fyfe
2 Bartel
1 Pavlich

Kang v Ess
3 Stanton
2 Ryder
1 Zaharakis

WB v WCE
3 Kennedy
2 Priddis
1 Cox

Port v StK
3 Dal Santo
2 Hartlett
1 Ebert

P.S- We all should know who will get 3 votes in last nights match!!!

[Usman]

Sorry for the delay guys been busy!

Round 2

BL v Carl
3 Judd
2 Murphy
1 Carrazo

Ess v Port
3 Watson
2 Stanton
1 Monfries

Syd v Fre
3 Kennedy
2 Sandilands
1 Malceski

WCE v Melb
3 Selwood
2 Shuey
1 Masten

Coll v Rich
3 Pendlebury
2 Rance
1 Deldio

Adel v WB
3 Boyd
2 Thompson
1 Vince

NM v GWS
3 Bastinac
2 Swallow
1 Harvey

StK v GC
3 Ablett
2 Goddard
1 Hayes

Geel v Haw
3 Hawkins
2 Mitchell
1 Whitecross

Round 3 and leaderboard coming!

[Usman]

Round 3

Carl v Coll
3 Murphy
2 Judd
1 Carazzo - Could possibly deserve more but im not sure the umpires will recognise his brilliant defensive work during the game.

Rich v Melb
3 Tuck
2 Grigg
1 Foley

Syd v Port
3 Hannebery
2 Cassisi
1 Parker
Kennedy must be unlucky to miss out as he got another perfect 10 from the coaches in this game, but the scoring system liked other players more.

Fre v BL
3 Mzungu
2 Duffield
1 Pearce

GC v Ess
3 Ablett
2 Watson
1 Howlett

WB v StK
3 Hayes
2 Dempster
1 Boyd

GWS v WCE
3 Shuey
2 Masten
1 Selwood
amazingly the same three as last week predicted to vote (same as Carlton from round 2-3) just in a different order

Haw v Adel
3 Franklin
2 Gibson
1 Lewis

NM v Geel
3 Wells
2 Ziebell
1 Harvey

Leaderboard

9 Ablett (GC)
8 Murphy (Carl)
6 Pendlebury (Coll)
6 Kennedy (Syd)
5 Watson (Ess)
5 Judd (Carl)
5 Stanton (Ess)
5 Franklin (Haw)
5 Shuey (WCE)
4 Sandilands (Fre)
4 Hayes (StK)
4 Thompson (Adel)
4 Boyd (WB)
4 S.Selwood (WCE)

[TheMailman]

In round 1 you only have Ablett down for 2 votes meaning his total would be 8 ;)

[Usman]

In round 1 you only have Ablett down for 2 votes meaning his total would be 8 ;)

they are not my votes the are mads votes  ;)

[upthemaidens]

that leaderboard is pretty much the same names i have(slight difference in some of the overall votes)  im not sure if ablett will get 3 votes in every game, but i guess he may have..
 

[Usman]

Ablett with 9 seems crazy in a winless team, but when you average 43 touches 9 clearences an 2 goals a game, you see how its possible.

[upthemaidens]

Ablett with 9 seems crazy in a winless team, but when you average 43 touches 9 clearences an 2 goals a game, you see how its possible.

yeah i think i went for more of a cautious voting for him..  i wished i had of backed him at the start at $10