Suckling v Birchall

[Justin Bieber]

I have both >.> <.<

That's risky...

[Chelskiman]

I have both >.> <.<

That's risky...

Possibly.  I've seen a lot of teams with Scotland, Goddard, Lids and Suckling/Birchall.  It's no different to that really.  Unless he has all five, which is one hell of a defence, lol.

[Scotch]

It doesn't affect the byes so unless  Hawthorns defence gets put under fire (literally) I don't see the risk.  I see more chance of Scotland dropping in price than either Suckling or Birchall, not that I think it will happen anyway.

[elephants]

I have Birchall over Suckling.
I see him as a more solid player (has slowly built up to his 90 ave.).
Suckling has had one good year and has injuries...

[Justin Bieber]

I have both >.> <.<

That's risky...

Possibly.  I've seen a lot of teams with Scotland, Goddard, Lids and Suckling/Birchall.  It's no different to that really.  Unless he has all five, which is one hell of a defence, lol.

Might as well have Carrots and Scotland.

[Scrads]

Birchall. Way more secure in the best 22.