Suckling v Birchall

Started by swanny89, March 14, 2012, 08:15:50 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Which would you pick?

Suckling
Birchall
Other
Print
Go Down Pages 1 2
User actions

Justin Bieber

#15
March 15, 2012, 12:27:08 AM
Quote from: Scotch on March 14, 2012, 11:49:35 PM
I have both >.> <.<
That's risky...

Chelskiman

#16
March 15, 2012, 12:28:51 AM
Quote from: whatlez on March 15, 2012, 12:27:08 AM
Quote from: Scotch on March 14, 2012, 11:49:35 PM
I have both >.> <.<
That's risky...

Possibly.  I've seen a lot of teams with Scotland, Goddard, Lids and Suckling/Birchall.  It's no different to that really.  Unless he has all five, which is one hell of a defence, lol.

Scotch

#17
March 15, 2012, 12:48:25 AM
It doesn't affect the byes so unless  Hawthorns defence gets put under fire (literally) I don't see the risk.  I see more chance of Scotland dropping in price than either Suckling or Birchall, not that I think it will happen anyway.

elephants

#18
March 15, 2012, 01:42:44 AM
I have Birchall over Suckling.
I see him as a more solid player (has slowly built up to his 90 ave.).
Suckling has had one good year and has injuries...

Justin Bieber

#19
March 15, 2012, 02:05:12 PM
Quote from: Chelskiman on March 15, 2012, 12:28:51 AM
Quote from: whatlez on March 15, 2012, 12:27:08 AM
Quote from: Scotch on March 14, 2012, 11:49:35 PM
I have both >.> <.<
That's risky...

Possibly.  I've seen a lot of teams with Scotland, Goddard, Lids and Suckling/Birchall.  It's no different to that really.  Unless he has all five, which is one hell of a defence, lol.
Might as well have Carrots and Scotland.

Scrads

#20
March 15, 2012, 03:56:09 PM
Birchall. Way more secure in the best 22.
Print
Go Up Pages 1 2
User actions